Aspects of Technology
 : Hei Whakamärama i te Kaupapa o NEMP – Explaining NEMP
Loading Images

Approach: One to one  

304Kb
Focus: Explaining and expressing opinions
Resources:   Cue card
Questions/instructions:
Mö tënei mahi, me äta whakaaro ki tënei kaupapa e mahi nei koe, te NEMP. Kua pätai mai tëtahi hoa, he aha rä tö mahi i tënei kaupapa. Mäu e whakamärama atu he aha te take e mahi ana koe i tënei kaupapa o NEMP, he aha ngä mahi pärekareka ki a koe, he aha hoki ngä mahi käore e pai ana.
Äta whakaaro mö tëtahi wä. Kei runga i tënei käri ëtahi ähuatanga hei
körero mäu.
Hoatu te käri ki te äkonga.		 In this activity you will imagine that a friend has asked you what you have been doing when you come to these sessions. You might like to tell them why you are doing NEMP activities, what you liked the most, and any of the things you didn’t like very much.

You can have a few moments to think about what you would tell a friend about NEMP. This card reminds you of things you might like to talk about.
Give cue card to student. Allow time.
explain 01 explain 02
1. Körerohia mai ö whakamärama mö NEMP.
he äwhina: He körero atu anö hei whakawhänui
i tö whakautu?		 What would you tell your friend about NEMP?
prompt: Can you tell me more about that?
 
% responses
To what extent did the student explain the general purpose of NEMP?
substantially
5
somewhat
35
very little/not at all
60
To what extent did the student explain about the different session types?
more than two types
2
one or two types
16
not at all
82
To what extent did the student identify and describe tasks that he/she particularly enjoyed:
more than one task described in detail
2
more than one task mentioned, not in detail
29
one task, described in detail
2
one task just mentioned or general comments
36
no tasks mentioned
31
To what extent did the student explain why he/she enjoyed one or more tasks?
well justified
11
somewhat justified
44
not at all
45
To what extent did the student identify and describe tasks that he/she didn’t like:
more than one task described in detail
0
more than one task mentioned, not in detail
2
one task, described in detail
5
 
one task just mentioned or general comments
24
 
no tasks mentioned
69
To what extent did the student explain why he/she did not enjoy one or more tasks:
well justified
10
somewhat justified
22
not at all
68
Speech clarity:
strong
65
moderate
33
weak
2
Clarity of expression of individual comments:
strong
35
moderate
49
weak
16
Organisation/flow of explanation:
strong
21
moderate
42
weak
37
Overall quality of description of NEMP:
high
0
quite high
10
moderate
40
weak
50
Total score:
20–25
0
 
16–19
0
12–15
20
8–11
46
4–7
20
0–3
14
Commentary:
Many of the students presented their comments well but most were skimpy in the amount of detail they included.
 
Loading Images