|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
%
responses 2007 ('03) |
||||||||||
y4 |
y8
|
||||||||||
Picture chosen by team: |
A
|
13 (25) |
27 (22) |
||||||||
B |
5 (0) |
4 (3) |
|||||||||
C |
25 (22) |
18 (17) |
|||||||||
D |
38 (42) |
28 (32) |
|||||||||
E |
18 (12) |
24 (25) |
|||||||||
Number of team members who originally chose that picture: |
all |
11 (7) |
15 (2) |
||||||||
all except one |
25 (20) |
26 (29) |
|||||||||
half |
26 (27) |
31 (29) |
|||||||||
one |
24 (27) |
24 (32) |
|||||||||
How well did the team discuss the use of colour in the picture? [Use of art vocabulary (cool, warm, tone, hue, primary, etc.); comment on colour combinations (complementary, contrasting); use of colour to achieve particular effects.] |
very well |
5 (5) |
17 (9) |
||||||||
well |
24 (22) |
34 (36) |
|||||||||
moderately well |
48 (51) |
35 (36) |
|||||||||
poorly |
23 (22) |
14 (20) |
|||||||||
How well did the team discuss
the way the picture has been
drawn or painted? [Criteria as for colour, above; style (e.g. realistic, stylised, abstract); composition (e.g. relation of tree and background); technique (e.g. brushstokes, dotting).] |
very well |
4 (0) |
14 (9) |
||||||||
well |
23 (26) |
32 (29) |
|||||||||
moderately well |
44 (55) |
41 (43) |
|||||||||
poorly |
30 (19) |
13 (20) |
|||||||||
How well did the team discuss
the content of the picture? [Type of tree; form/shape of tree; landscape features other than the tree; finer details (e.g. birds in B).] |
very strongly |
13 (5) |
21 (16) |
||||||||
quite strongly |
39 (56) |
41 (44) |
|||||||||
a little |
44 (36) |
32 (39) |
|||||||||
not at all |
5 (3) |
5 (2) |
|||||||||
How strongly did the team relate
to the picture as particulary
suitable for their school? (i.e. engaged in possibilities) |
very strongly |
11 (12) |
25 (21) |
||||||||
quite strongly |
45 (56) |
43 (26) |
|||||||||
a little |
40 (27) |
30 (49) |
|||||||||
not at all |
4 (5) |
3 (4) |
|||||||||
Suggestions for places
to put the picture: |
staffroom |
3 (8) |
3 (2) |
||||||||
exterior location |
42 (30) |
32 (24) |
|||||||||
school library |
15 (10) |
14 (14) |
|||||||||
school hall/gym |
12 (13) |
6 (10) |
|||||||||
entrance area |
9 (5) |
17 (19) |
|||||||||
other inside public area (e.g. hallway) |
8 (17) |
20 (26) |
|||||||||
individual classroom |
3 (3) |
2 (2) |
|||||||||
no clear decision |
3 (3) |
2 (0) |
|||||||||
other |
5 (10) |
6 (3) |
|||||||||
students clearly thought it was
a real tree |
42 (43) |
31 (21) |
|||||||||
Total
score: |
10–12 |
5 (4) |
15 (11) |
||||||||
8–9 |
14 (14) |
23 (18) |
|||||||||
6–7 |
23 (30) |
27 (27) |
|||||||||
4–5 |
36 (42) |
23 (24) |
|||||||||
0–3 |
23 (11) |
10 (20) |
Commentary: |
This task engaged students in a group discussion about which painting would be best for their school. These discussions were often lively and engendered many strong conversations. Students at both year 4 and year 8 were able to discuss a number of aspects of the painting (use of colour, method of painting or drawing, and the content of the works) in making their decisions. At year 8, students in 2007 outperformed students from the 2003 sample. One interesting aspect of the task was that in a number of groups (roughly 42% at year 4 and 31% at year 8), the group of students came to believe that they were locating a real tree in their school rather than a painting of a tree. |
|