|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
%
responses |
|||||||||||
gives
appropriate reason for message |
75 |
||||||||||
Information
about dog (from picture): |
type
of dog – hush puppy or basset hound |
0 |
|||||||||
medium
size |
30 |
||||||||||
long,
floppy ears |
50 |
||||||||||
short,
stumpy legs |
6 |
||||||||||
loose/folds
of skin (jowls) |
7 |
||||||||||
collar
and tag |
66 |
||||||||||
Colouring: (score
out of 7 for different colour features) 7 |
2 |
||||||||||
6
|
2 |
||||||||||
5
|
0 |
||||||||||
4
|
3 |
||||||||||
3
|
26 |
||||||||||
2
|
21 |
||||||||||
1
|
26 |
||||||||||
0
|
20 |
||||||||||
contact
information given (phone,
address or email address) |
61 |
||||||||||
Overall message: | |||||||||||
How
clear, accurate and complete
is the message? |
very
good |
0 |
|||||||||
good
|
9 |
||||||||||
moderate
|
45 |
||||||||||
fairly
weak |
18 |
||||||||||
non
existent or very weak |
28 |
||||||||||
How well sequenced are the components of the message? | |||||||||||
very
well sequenced (reason, description, contact details) |
26 |
||||||||||
moderately
well sequenced |
28 |
||||||||||
rather
jumbled |
46 |
||||||||||
Did
the student include any invented information: (such as the name of
the dog) |
39 |
||||||||||
Total
score: |
16–18
|
0 |
|||||||||
13–15 |
7 |
||||||||||
10–12
|
19 |
||||||||||
7–9
|
30 |
||||||||||
4–6
|
25 |
||||||||||
0–3
|
19 |
||||||||||
Commentary: Only about one quarter of the students gave good details to help identify the dog and know how to respond to the advertisement. |