|
Acknowledgements
The Project
directors acknowledge the vital support and contributions of many
people to this report, including:
- the
very dedicated staff of the Educational Assessment Research Unit
- Stephen
Porteners and other staff members of the Ministry of Education
- members
of the Project’s National Advisory Committee
- members
of the Project’s Music Advisory Panel
- Alison
Caldwell and students from St Bridgets School, Dunedin
- principals
and children of the schools where tasks were trialled
- principals,
staff and Board of Trustee members of the 254 schools included in
the 2004 sample
- the
2876 children who participated in the assessments and their parents
- the
96 teachers who administered the assessments to the children
- the
48 senior tertiary students who assisted with the marking process
- the
195 teachers who assisted with the marking of tasks early in 2005.
|
|
|
Summary
New
Zealand's National Education Monitoring Project commenced in 1993,
with the task of assessing and reporting on the achievement of New Zealand
primary school children in all areas of the school curriculum. Children
are assessed at two class levels: year 4 (halfway through primary education)
and year 8 (at the end of primary education). Different curriculum areas
and skills are assessed each year, over a four-year cycle. The main
goal of national monitoring is to provide detailed information about
what children can do so that patterns of performance can be recognised,
successes celebrated, and desirable changes to educational practices
and resources identified and implemented.
Each year, small random samples of children are selected nationally,
then assessed in their own schools by teachers specially seconded and
trained for this work. Task instructions are given orally by teachers,
through video presentations, on laptop computers, or in writing. Many
of the assessment tasks involve the children in the use of equipment
and supplies. Their responses are presented orally, by demonstration,
in writing, in computer files, or through submission of other physical
products. Many of the responses are recorded on videotape for subsequent
analysis.
The use of many tasks with both year 4 and year 8 students allows comparisons
of the performance of year 4 and 8 students in 2004. Because some tasks
have been used twice, in 2000 and again in 2004, trends in performance
across the four-year period can also be analysed. |
|
|
Assessing Music
In
2004, the second year of the third cycle of national monitoring, three
areas were assessed: music, aspects of technology, and reading and speaking.
This report presents details and results of the assessments in music.
Music education represents part of a balanced curriculum for all New
Zealand school students. A music education gives learners opportunities
to develop their aesthetic appreciation, their capacities for original
and imaginative expression, and their abilities to use and interpret
musical elements for a variety of purposes and with a range of materials.
A framework for music education and its assessment is presented in Chapter
2.
This framework highlights four fundamental processes: creating, performing,
responding and understanding music. |
|
|
Creating Music
Chapter
3 examines achievement involving creating music. Averaged across
18 task components used with both year 4 and year 8 students, 10 percent
more year 8 than year 4 students or teams produced good responses. This
indicates that, on average, students have made useful but modest progress
between year 4 and year 8 in the skills assessed by the tasks. Year
8 students tended to be markedly stronger than year 4 students in the
technical aspects of tasks, but weaker in displaying vitality and colour
in their performances.
Two trend tasks involving a total of six components were administered
to students in both the 2000 and 2004 assessments. Because of the small
number of task components involved, and the consequent limitations of
the reliability of the trend data, the trends for creating music tasks
across the four-year period will not be reported separately but are
included in the overall trends reported later in this summary. |
|
|
Performing Music
Chapter
4 examines achievement in performing music. Averaged across
55 task components used with both year 4 and year 8 students, eight
percent more year 8 than year 4 students or teams produced good responses.
Year 4 students performed as well or better than year 8 students on
most task components involving singing, with year 8 students doing
substantially better on the other tasks.
Three
trend tasks involving a total of 19 components were administered to
year 4 students in both the 2000 and 2004 assessments. Overall, little
change was evident. Looking at the number of year 4 students achieving
the most positive rating category for each component, there was improvement
from 2000 to 2004 on 11 of the 19 components, with, on average, two
percent more students gaining the highest rating in 2004. The same
analysis for year 8 students showed improvements from 2000 to 2004
on eight of the 19 components, but on average one percent fewer students
gained the highest rating in 2004. |
|
|
Responding to Music
Chapter 5 reports achievement in responding to music. Averaged across
28 task components, nine percent more year 8 than year 4 students (or
teams of students) produced good responses. This indicates that, on
average, students have made useful but modest progress between year
4 and year 8 in the skills assessed by the tasks. Year 8 students scored
higher on all 28 of the task components.
Two trend tasks involving a total of five components were administered
to students in both the 2000 and 2004 assessments. Because of the small
number of task components involved, and the consequent limitations of
the reliability of the trend data, the trends for creating music tasks
across the four-year period will not be reported separately, but are
included in the overall trends reported later in this summary. |
|
|
Understanding Music
Chapter
6 examines achievement relating to understanding music. Averaged
across 47 task components, 19 percent more year 8 than year 4 students
(or teams of students) produced the best or correct responses. This
indicates that, on average, students have made very substantial progress
between year 4 and year 8 in the skills assessed by the tasks. Year
8 students scored higher on all 47 of the task components.
Three trend tasks involving a total of 15 components were administered
to students in both the 2000 and 2004 assessments. For year 4 students
there was no meaningful change in performance between 2000 and 2004.
The percentage of students succeeding increased very slightly from 2000
to 2004, with higher performance in 2004 on eight of the 15 components,
and one percent more students, on average, choosing the correct or preferred
responses. For year 8 students the picture there was a marginal decline
in performance. The percentage of students succeeding decreased very
slightly from 2000 to 2004, with lower performance in 2004 on 10 of
the 15 components, and two percent fewer students, on average, choosing
the correct or preferred responses. |
|
|
Overall Trends
Overall
trends across time were examined by comparing the performance of students
in 2000 and 2004 on the 45 components of the 10 trend tasks. Two performance
standards were used: students who chose correct answers or achieved
a high level of performance; and students who chose correct answers
or achieved a high or medium level of performance.
Using the higher standard, on average, two percent more year 4 students
succeeded in 2004 than in 2000, with improvement on 26 of the 45 task
components. For year 8 students, on average, there was no change in
performance between 2000 and 2004, with improvement on 18 of the 45
task components.
Using the lower standard, on average four percent more year 4 students
succeeded in 2004 than in 2000, with improvement on 26 of the 45 task
components. For year 8 students, on average one percent more students
succeeded in 2004 than in 2000, with improvement on 21 of the 45 task
components.
In summary, then, there is evidence of slight improvement for year 4
students, with a greater reduction in low performance than an increase
in really high performance. There is no meaningful change in the performance
of year 8 students. |
|
|
Music Survey
Chapter
7 presents the results of the music surveys, which sought information
from students about their involvement in and enjoyment of music curriculum
experiences at school. Students were also asked about their involvement
in and enjoyment of music- related activities out of school time.
Year 4 students generally were very positive about doing music at school.
Half chose the highest rating to describe how much they liked doing
music at school, and more than half warmly anticipated further study
of music at school, virtually unchanged from the 2000 results. There
appears to have been a modest increase in some music activities in school
since 2000, particularly in regard to listening to music, which comfortably
exceeds singing as the dominant activity. There continues to be a large
gap between the enjoyment of playing instruments and the extent to which
this activity is included in school programmes. Opportunities to make
up (compose) music seem to be infrequent. Outside of school, the most
common activity is listening to music, which is also rated the most
enjoyed activity. Twenty-five percent said they learned music or belonged
to a music group outside of school, unchanged from 2000.
Compared to year 4 students, year 8 students were less inclined to use
the most positive categories. This pattern has been common in national
monitoring surveys.
Year 8 students were quite positive about doing music at school, with
percentages little changed from 2000. In school music programmes, there
appear to have been moderate increases in listening to music, and dancing
or moving to music. Enjoyment of the activities has been maintained
across the last eight years, except for a small decline in enjoyment
of singing. Opportunities to make up (compose) music seem to be infrequent.
Outside of school, by far the most common activity is listening to music,
which is also very strongly rated the most enjoyed activity. Twenty-eight
percent said they learned music or belonged to a music group outside
of school, slightly down from 30 percent in 1996. |
|
|
Performance of Demographic Subgroup
Chapter
8 reports the results of analyses that compared the task performance
and survey responses of different demographic subgroups.
School type (full primary or intermediate), school size, community size
and geographic zone did not seem to be important factors predicting
achievement on the music tasks. The same was true for the 2000 and 1996
assessments. However, there were statistically significant differences
in the performance of students from low, medium and high decile schools
on 36 percent of the tasks at year 4 level (compared to 57 percent in
2000 and 35 percent in 1996), and 45 percent of the tasks at year 8
level (compared to 27 percent in 2000 and 45 percent in 1996).
For the comparisons of boys with girls, Pakeha with Mäori, Pakeha
with Pasifika students, and students for whom the predominant language
at home was English with those for whom it was not, effect sizes were
used. Effect size is the difference in mean (average) performance of
the two groups, divided by the pooled standard deviation of the scores
on the particular task. For this summary, these effect sizes were averaged
across all tasks.
Girls averaged slightly higher than boys, with mean effect sizes of
0.08 for year 4 students and 0.19 for year 8 students (the corresponding
figures in 2000 were 0.15 and 0.10). These are all small differences.
As was also true in 2000, the music survey results at both year levels
showed that girls were substantially more positive than boys about music
activities and more involved in them in their own time.
Pakeha students averaged slightly higher than Mäori students, with
mean effect sizes of 0.14 for year 4 students and 0.16 for year 8 students
(the corresponding figures in 2000 were 0.20 and 0.17). These are all
small differences. The music survey results, however, showed that Mäori
students were more involved in and enthusiastic about some aspects of
music.
Pakeha students averaged very slightly (negligibly) higher than Pasifika
students, with mean effect sizes of 0.02 for year 4 students and 0.07
for year 8 students (distinctly closer than in 2000, when the corresponding
figures were 0.18 and 0.24). The music survey results showed that Pasifika
students were more involved in and enthusiastic about some aspects of
music, notably with 17 percent more Pasifika than Pakeha year 8 students
(45 percent versus 28 percent) reporting that they were learning music
or involved in a music group outside of school.
Compared to students for whom the predominant language at home was English,
students from homes where other languages predominated averaged very
slightly (negligibly) higher, with mean effect sizes of 0.01 for year
4 students and 0.02 for year 8 students. Comparative figures are not
available from the assessments four-years earlier.
|