American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Designs for science literacy. Oxford University Press. Barker, M. (2000). Learning theories in science teaching — hindsight or master plan? New Zealand Science Teacher, 94, 32–39. Biddulph, F., & Carr, K. (1999). Learning theories and curriculum. Teachers and Curriculum, 3, 31–35. Bullock, M., & Ziegler, A. (1999). Scientific reasoning: Developmental and individual differences In F. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.) Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich longitudinal study (pp. 38–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chalmers, A. (1982). What is this thing called science? Queensland: University of Queensland Press. Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70 (5), 1098–1120. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 323–393. Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Children's responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 327–343. Coles, B., MacIntyre, B., & Radford, A. (2001). What to exemplify; science education and the cultures of our schools. Annual Conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Christchurch, 6–9 December. Crooks, T., & Flockton, L. (1996). Science Assessment Results 1995. National Educational Monitoring Report 1. University of Otago: The Educational Assessment Research Unit. Crooks, T., & Flockton, L. (2000). Science Assessment Results 1999: National Educational Monitoring Report 13. University of Otago: The Educational Assessment Research Unit. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press. Fensham, P. (1985). Science for all. Educational Leadership, 44, 18–23. Fensham, P. (1994). Progression in school science curriculum: A rational prospect or a chimera? Research in Science Education, 24, 76–82. Gilmore, A. (2001). National Education Monitoring Project: Assessment Resources for Teachers. Report to the Ministry of Education. Christchurch: University of Canterbury. Gott, R., & Mashiter, J. (1994). Practical work in science: A task based approach? In R. Levinson (Ed.) Teaching science. London and New York: Routledge. Haigh, M. (1999). Learning to be investigators. Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA) Annual Conference, Rotorua, July 1999. Harrison, C., Simon, S., & Watson, R. (2000). Progression and differentiation. In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.) Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 174–189). Buckingham, Phildelphia: Open University Press. Hipkins, R., Bolstad, R., Baker, R., Jones, A., Barker, M., Bell, B., Coll, R., Cooper, B., Forret, M., France, B., Haigh, M., Harlow, A., & Taylor, I. (2002). Curriculum, learning and effective pedagogy: A literature review in science education. Wellington: Ministry of Education. Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84 (1), 51–70. Klahr, D. (1999). Comment: “Scientific Reasoning”. In F. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.) Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich longitudinal study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (4), 495–523. Masnick, A., & Klahr, D. (2001) Elementary school children's understanding of experimental error. Paper presented at Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mayer, V., & Kumano, Y. (1999). The role of system science in future school science curricula. Studies in Science Education, 34, 71–91. Metz, K. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children's science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65 (2), 93–127. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.) (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Kings College. Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 82 (301), 63–70. Poskitt, J. (2002). National consultation on exemplars: What difference does it make for teachers? set: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 13–16. Rollnick, M., Lubben, F., Lotz, S., & Dlamini, B. (2002). What do underprepared students learn about measurement from introductory laboratory work? Research in Science Education, 32, 1–18. Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology, 32 (1), 102–119. Sheehy, N., Wylie, J., McGuinness, C., & Orchard, G. (2000). How children solve environmental problems: using computer simulations to investigate systems thinking. Environmental Education Research, 6 (2), 109–126. Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (3), 349–422. Toth, E., Klahr, D., & Chen, Z. (2000). Bridging research and practice: a cognitively based classroom intervention for teaching experimentation skills to elementary school children. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (4), 423–459. Toth, E., Suthers, D., & Lesgold, A. (2002). “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86 (2), 264–286. Watson, R. (1996). Rethinking readiness for learning. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 148–171). Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell. Watson, R., Goldsworthy, A., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1999). What is not fair with investigations? School Science Review, 80 (292), 101–106. Watson, R., Goldsworthy, A., & Wood-Robinson, V. (2000). Beyond the fair test. In J. Sears & P. Sorensen (Eds.), Issues in Science Teaching (pp. 70–79). London and New York: Routledge Falmer. Zeidler, D., Walker, K., Ackett, W., & Simmons, M. (2002). Tangled up views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86 (3), 343–367. Zohar, A. (1995).
Reasoning about interactions between variables. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 32 (10), 1039–1063. |
|
![]() |
![]() |