|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses |
||||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
1. What’s the game called? | ||||||||||||||||
student gave the game a name |
97 |
98 |
||||||||||||||
2. Imagine I know nothing about this game. Explain to me how the game is played, so that
I would understand how to play it myself. |
||||||||||||||||
Extent of detail given in playing the game: | extensive detail |
8 |
23 |
|||||||||||||
substantial detail |
37 |
41 |
||||||||||||||
moderate detail |
43 |
30 |
||||||||||||||
very limited detail |
12 |
6 |
||||||||||||||
How well organised was the explanation? | very well |
19 |
31 |
|||||||||||||
moderately well |
72 |
65 |
||||||||||||||
any other response |
9 |
4 |
||||||||||||||
3. Tell me what makes this a really good game to play – why you like playing it. |
||||||||||||||||
Extent to which the student explained why he/she liked playing the game: |
substantial justification |
27 |
39 |
|||||||||||||
a little justification |
66 |
55 |
||||||||||||||
not at all (e.g.“I like it” or equivalent) |
7 |
6 |
||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
6–7 |
13 |
28 |
|||||||||||||
5 |
17 |
18 |
||||||||||||||
4 |
20 |
24 |
||||||||||||||
3 |
34 |
22 |
||||||||||||||
0–2 |
16 |
8 |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
Students who chose a very complex team game like rugby created a real challenge for themselves. Performance differences among the subgroups were small for year 4 students but, at year 8 level, Pakeha students scored markedly higher than Mäori and Pasifika students, on average.
|