|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
%
responses 2008 ('04) |
|||||||||||||||
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
Degree to which enthusiasm
for having friend over had
been communicated: |
very strongly |
14 (8) |
|||||||||||||
strongly |
39 (32) |
||||||||||||||
moderately |
39 (48) |
||||||||||||||
weakly |
8 (12) |
||||||||||||||
Degree to which possible parental
arguments against had been
addressed and/or countered
by alternative arguments: |
extensively |
25 (17) |
|||||||||||||
substantially |
40 (29) |
||||||||||||||
moderately |
30 (42) |
||||||||||||||
very little/not at all |
5 (12) |
||||||||||||||
Coherence of
presentation: |
very coherent |
61 (50) |
|||||||||||||
moderately coherent |
35 (43) |
||||||||||||||
not coherent |
4 (7) |
||||||||||||||
Speech clarity: |
high |
84 (80) |
|||||||||||||
moderate |
14 (17) |
||||||||||||||
low |
2 (3) |
||||||||||||||
Overall strength of argument: |
very persuasive |
19 (16) |
|||||||||||||
quite persuasive |
42 (34) |
||||||||||||||
a little persuasive |
32 (40) |
||||||||||||||
not persuasive |
7 (10) |
||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
12–13 |
18 (17) |
|||||||||||||
10–11 |
25 (15) |
||||||||||||||
8–9 |
22 (18) |
||||||||||||||
6–7 |
22 (29) |
||||||||||||||
0–5 |
13 (21) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
There was a wide range of performance on this task, arising mainly from the first two criteria (communication of enthusiasm and addressing probable parental concerns). Performance improved a little from 2004 to 2008. Girls had their largest margin over boys for any speaking tasks. |