|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses 2008 ('04) |
||||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
Drama and characterisation
through spoken word: |
strong |
39 (33) |
46 (44) |
|||||||||||||
moderate |
42 (39) |
36 (30) |
||||||||||||||
weak |
19 (28) |
18 (26) |
||||||||||||||
Timing, continuity of
interaction with others: |
strong |
38 (35) |
56 (44) |
|||||||||||||
moderate |
47 (45) |
33 (39) |
||||||||||||||
weak |
15 (20) |
11 (17) |
||||||||||||||
Speech clarity: (can listener hear/understand words) |
strong |
37 (34) |
49 (42) |
|||||||||||||
moderate |
42 (39) |
35 (39) |
||||||||||||||
weak |
21 (27) |
16 (19) |
||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
6 |
24 (21) |
31 (32) |
|||||||||||||
5 |
11 (11) |
20 (10) |
||||||||||||||
4 |
16 (12) |
15 (11) |
||||||||||||||
3 |
24 (22) |
15 (19) |
||||||||||||||
0–2 |
25 (34) |
19 (28) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
There was a wide range of performance at both year levels, with a very modest improvement from year 4 to year 8 (mainly arising from better co-ordination among the student performers). For both year 4 and year 8 students, performance increased moderately from 2004 to 2008, mainly through fewer low scores.
|