Approach: Team |
Focus:
Plan, carry out and
report results for an experiment involving a toy truck launched down a ramp with
varying slope. Extrapolate results, check and interpret. |
|
228k |
Resources: Toy
truck, track, cloth, 5 corks (1 hidden), 1 metre folding ruler, instruction card. |
Questions / instructions:
Set up the cloth and track
on a level surface, with the far end of the track raised on three corks. Place
the 4th cork nearby,and the ruler (folded) alongside the cloth. Keep the 5th cork
out of sight.
Instruction
card
|
1. Your task is to find
out:
how the slope of the ramp affects how far the truck travels
whether the truck goes further forwards or backwards.
|
2. Think about how you
will do the experiment.
What will you keep the same?
How will you do the measurements? |
3. You are to work as a
team and make sure that everyone helps. |
4. Record your measurements
on the results sheet. |
In this activity you are
going to find out how the slope of this ramp affects how far the truck will travel
on the cloth after it rolls down the ramp. You will need to use the ruler to measure
how far the truck goes. You will use one, two, three or four corks under the end
of the track, to make the slope more steep or less steep. At the moment there
are three corks under the track, so it is quite steep. For each slope, you should
make measurements with the truck going forward and other measurements
with the truck going backward. Perhaps it will make a difference whether
it is going forward or backward. Let me show you once how the truck goes.
Show the truck going
down the ramp once, forwards. Then pick up the truck and hold it while you give
the next instructions, and while the team does its planning.
Results
|
Number
of corks
|
Distance
going forwards
|
Distance
going backwards
|
1
|
a
|
a
|
2
|
a
|
a
|
3
|
a
|
a
|
4
|
a
|
a
|
5
|
a
|
a
|
You are to work as a team,
and try to make sure that everyone helps. First, you should plan how you will
do the experiment. Think about what things you will need to keep the same. Think
about how you will do the measurements. Sort out who is going to do the measurements
and who will do the other jobs. Everyone should have a job. You may want to change
jobs half way through, so you each try two jobs.
a
a
|
Plan
your experiment now, and tell me when you have finished your planning. |
a |
a |
%
responses
|
y4
1999(1995)
|
Planning to achieve: |
a
|
a |
consistent
set-up and release of truck
|
11
(0)
|
accurate
measurement of travel
|
29
(27)
|
check
on consistency by replicating
|
0
(0)
|
requested
member particpation
|
96
(90)
|
After they have finished
planning, give the group the truck and results sheet.
Here is the truck, and a sheet to record your results on. You can do your experiment
now. Tell me when you have finished and recorded all your results.
After they have finished experimenting:
What did you find out in your experiment?
Prompts:How does the slope affect how far the truck goes? Does it make any
difference whether the truck travels backwards or forwards? [If they think it
does, ask "Can you figure out why?"]
|
a
|
Could
you have done anything to make your results more accurate? What? |
Experimentation: |
a
|
a |
good
consistency in release of truck
|
72
(73)
|
good
accuracy in measurement
|
54
(43)
|
included
replication consistently
|
6
(3)
|
completed
all combinations of slope and truck orientations
|
81
(73)
|
recorded
results accurately
|
35
(30)
|
Reporting: |
a
|
a |
clear
and accurate
|
42
(43)
|
rather
"fuzzy"
|
48
(47)
|
very
unclear or inaccurate
|
10
(10)
|
What do you think would
happen with five corks? Make a prediction and tell me why you think that.
After discussion,
give them the 5th cork:
Test with this fifth cork, and see if you were right.
|
a
|
a |
Predictions
& discussions: |
a
|
a |
very
good
|
32
(28)
|
moderate
|
55
(62)
|
poor
|
13
(10)
|
Commentary:
Teams of students in both 1995 and 1999 showed quite limited ability to anticipate
issues during planning. Replication was almost non-existent a serious fault
in scientific investigations. Measurement and recording of results were other
weaknesses. Overall, there is evidence of some improvement between 1995 and 1999. |