|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
%
responses 2007 ('03) |
||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||
Eyes: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
38 (36) |
40 (49) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
23 (30) |
15 (32) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
39 (34) |
45 (19) |
||||||||||||
Ears: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
34 (42) |
34 (44) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
17 (22) |
11 (25) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
49 (36) |
55 (31) |
||||||||||||
Nose: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
24 (25) |
20 (40) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
13 (19) |
8 (15) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
63 (56) |
72 (45) |
||||||||||||
Brain/nerves: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
2 (3) |
2 (1) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
1 (3) |
1 (1) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
97 (94) |
97 (98) |
||||||||||||
Muscles: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
2 (7) |
7 (9) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
1 (2) |
3 (3) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
97 (91) |
90 (88) |
||||||||||||
Legs: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
47 (52) |
54 (52) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
29 (30) |
20 (30) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
24 (18) |
26 (18) |
||||||||||||
Spine: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
54 (39) |
80 (79) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
24 (26) |
11 (5) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
22 (35) |
9 (16) |
||||||||||||
Pads on paws: (traction/grip/cushioning) |
body part mentioned and value for hunting adequately explained |
18 (8) |
46 (21) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
17 (5) |
14 (11) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
65 (87) |
40 (68) |
||||||||||||
Tail: (for steering/balance) |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
8 (9) |
18 (27) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
14 (14) |
5 (7) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
78 (77) |
77 (66) |
||||||||||||
Claws: (for gripping/tearing) |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
44 (61) |
56 (65) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
14 (13) |
11 (12) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
42 (26) |
33 (23) |
||||||||||||
Jaws/teeth: |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
33 (51) |
48 (56) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
21 (25) |
13 (20) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
46 (24) |
39 (24) |
||||||||||||
Colour/texture: (camouflage) |
body part mentioned and value
for hunting adequately explained |
17 (25) |
28 (39) |
|||||||||||
body part mentioned but value
for hunting not adequately explained |
4 (3) |
1 (2) |
||||||||||||
body part not mentioned |
79 (72) |
71 (59) |
||||||||||||
Overall, mentions: |
detection/tracking/guidance aspects
(at least one: eyes, ears, nose, brain) |
60 (60) |
55 (73) |
|||||||||||
locomotion aspects
(at least one: legs, muscles, spine) |
81 (83) |
93 (90) |
||||||||||||
weapons aspects
(at least one: jaws, teeth, claws) |
57 (76) |
63 (80) |
||||||||||||
camouflage aspects
(at least one: colour, texture) |
20 (28) |
29 (42) |
||||||||||||
Total
score: |
18–28 | 5 (10) |
14 (23) |
|||||||||||
14–17 | 20 (24) |
21 (35) |
||||||||||||
10–13 | 31 (30) |
34 (29) |
||||||||||||
6–9 | 29 (28) |
23 (10) |
||||||||||||
0–5 | 15 (8) |
8 (3) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
Year 4 and year 8 students performed quite similarly and, at both year levels, performance dropped markedly between 2003 and 2007. Year 8 boys performed noticeably better than girls. Year 4 Mäori students and year 8 Pasifika students performed quite similarly to their Pakeha counterparts. |