|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
%
responses 2007 ('03) |
||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||
1. What’s happening to the bulb? |
||||||||||||||
bulb lights up |
99 (99) |
99 (100) |
||||||||||||
Now touch A with one clip, at the same time touch C with the other clip. 2. What’s happening to the bulb? |
||||||||||||||
bulb doesn’t light up |
98 (99) |
99 (99) |
||||||||||||
Now touch A with one clip, at the same time touch D with the other clip. 3. What’s happening to the bulb? |
||||||||||||||
bulb lights up |
82 (84) |
75 (94) |
||||||||||||
4. Why do you think the bulb didn’t light
up when A and C were touched? Give student recording book and pencil. |
||||||||||||||
Quality of explanation: (A and C not connected, so circuit not complete, so electricity can’t flow to light up bulb) |
clear, detailed explanation |
0 (2) |
7 (4) |
|||||||||||
partial explanation |
10 (15) |
31 (34) |
||||||||||||
5. Draw what you think is inside
the mystery card. Allow time. |
||||||||||||||
A connected to B (directly or via D) |
54 (60) |
76 (82) |
||||||||||||
A connected to D (directly or via B) |
47 (56) |
60 (79) |
||||||||||||
A not connected to C (directly or indirectly) |
81 (88) |
86 (88) |
||||||||||||
6. Use your diagram to explain why the bulb lights up when some circles are touched but not with other circles. |
||||||||||||||
Explanation: |
clear, convincing explanation, using
diagram (explains lighting up
AND not lighting up) |
5 (7) |
17 (24) |
|||||||||||
partial explanation, using diagram
(explains at least one of lighting up
OR not lighting up) |
21 (25) |
38 (38) |
||||||||||||
Total
score: |
4–5 |
5 (11) |
28 (34) |
|||||||||||
3 |
30 (40) |
32 (40) |
||||||||||||
2 |
20 (12) |
17 (10) |
||||||||||||
0–1 |
45 (37) |
23 (16) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
This task was very popular but there were some problems with the mystery card for year 8 students in 2007 (the A to D link did not reliably produce the intended result). Performance dropped markedly for year 4 students between 2003 and 2007, but similar judgements are not justified for year 8 students because of the equipment problems. Year 4 Pakeha and Mäori students performed similarly. |