|
|
||||||||||
Questions/instructions: The card tells you the opinions of the person you are representing. Your job is to present that opinion as convincingly as possible to the rest of the team.You dont have to say only what is on your card, but need to make a good case to convince the rest of the committee. After you have done that, your whole committee needs to work together to decide what to tell the Board of Trustees - what should happen with the tree? Here are the opinion
cards for each of you and an instruction card to remind you what to
do. Assign a card
to each student, show instruction card and allow time until students
are ready (up to 10 minutes). |
||||||||||
%
responses
2001 ('97) |
||||||||||
y8
|
||||||||||
Does
everyone agree with that? Is there anything else you would like to add? |
||||||||||
How strongly was the case presented for cutting down the tree? |
very
strongly
|
12
(27)
|
||||||||
moderately
strongly
|
30
(20)
|
|||||||||
weakly
|
32
(30)
|
|||||||||
very
weakly
|
26
(23)
|
|||||||||
How strongly was the case presented against cutting down the tree? |
very
strongly
|
13 (20) | ||||||||
moderately
strongly
|
45 (37) | |||||||||
weakly
|
30 (20) | |||||||||
very
weakly
|
12 (23) | |||||||||
Overall, how strong was the debate? |
strong
and vigorous
|
24 (33) | ||||||||
moderately
strong
|
36 (27) | |||||||||
weak
|
27 (17) | |||||||||
very
weak
|
13 (23) | |||||||||
To what extent was consensus reached? |
very
strongly
|
39 (33) | ||||||||
moderately
strongly
|
47 (53) | |||||||||
minority
dissenting
|
8 (7) | |||||||||
no
consensus
|
6 (6) |
Commentary Most teams reached at least a moderately strong consensus, even though the cases for and against cutting down the tree often were not presented very strongly. Overall, the results achieved by the 2001 students were similar to those of the 1997 students. |