|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses 2008 ('04) |
||||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
Concept: | included one or more conceptual drawings in addition to final plan |
99 (99) |
100 (99) |
|||||||||||||
Plan included: |
3D drawing and net |
0 (1) |
5 (11) |
|||||||||||||
3D drawing |
48 (44) |
69 (59) |
||||||||||||||
net |
5 (6) |
8 (20) |
||||||||||||||
Shape of the container: |
special shape linked to shell shape |
21 (26) |
33 (42) |
|||||||||||||
rectangular prism/shape |
61 (57) |
62 (53) |
||||||||||||||
Is it possible to make a container from the plan? (ignoring dimensions at this point) |
yes, appropriate overlapping
joins/tabs/seam allowance |
1 (3) |
9 (21) |
|||||||||||||
yes, but with butt joins |
28 (33) |
61 (52) |
||||||||||||||
Measurements included: (including units) |
sufficient to make container to size |
3 (7) |
31 (40) |
|||||||||||||
some, but not sufficient |
48 (63) |
51 (42) |
||||||||||||||
Measurements appropriate to size of shell: (base 7.5cm, height 7cm, sloping sizes about 9cm; can allow up to 2.5cm more for packing space.) |
all |
2 (2) |
16 (22) |
|||||||||||||
some |
21 (33) |
43 (44) |
||||||||||||||
none |
76 (65) |
41 (34) |
||||||||||||||
Provided information on: |
material(s) for container |
64 (86) |
78 (82) |
|||||||||||||
how container is held together |
42 (57) |
57 (71) |
||||||||||||||
Clear where container
opens and closes: |
yes, with details |
8 (13) |
28 (33) |
|||||||||||||
yes, but without details |
51 (51) |
52 (53) |
||||||||||||||
plan included a transparent “window” so
the shell can be seen when the
box is closed (optional) |
7 (8) |
11 (6) |
||||||||||||||
Overall judgement of clarity and detail of plan for another person to make container: |
very good |
0 (0) |
5 (7) |
|||||||||||||
quite good |
2 (1) |
22 (29) |
||||||||||||||
key details missing or unclear |
29 (51) |
52 (45) |
||||||||||||||
seriously inadequate |
69 (49) |
21 (19) |
||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
10–12 |
2 (4) |
26 (38) |
|||||||||||||
8–9 |
8 (16) |
22 (24) |
||||||||||||||
6–7 |
19 (28) |
27 (19) |
||||||||||||||
4–5 |
29 (29) |
16 (13) |
||||||||||||||
0–3 |
43 (24) |
8 (7) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
Strong growth from year 4 to year 8 was seen in this task involving generating and evaluating a design for a container. Year 4 students had particular difficulty in coming up with a thorough plan with good measurements of the dimensions. Pakeha, Mäori and Pasifika students performed similarly at year 4; at year 8, Pakeha students performed better than Mäori students.
|
|