|
Approach: Station | |||||||
Focus: Designing equipment for a person with a physical disability. | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
%
responses
|
|||||||
GEd
|
MI
|
||||||
does plan need second person: | no | 82 |
92
|
||||
yes, to help | 13 | 8 | |||||
yes, to peel potato | 5 | 0 | |||||
does plan seem workable: | yes, clearly | 25 | 27 | ||||
probably | 35 | 42 | |||||
possibly | 31 | 27 | |||||
no | 9 | 4 | |||||
quality
of plan/diagram as a drawing, not judging workability |
quite detailed | 47 | 23 | ||||
rudimentary | 48 | 58 | |||||
none | 5 | 19 | |||||
quality
of explanation quite detailed
|
49 | 35 | |||||
rudimentary
|
43 | 48 | |||||
none
|
8 | 17 | |||||
nature of solution |
way
of holding potato still
|
62 | 59 | ||||
way
of holding peeler still
|
5 | 6 | |||||
machine
that can be operated with one hand
|
14 | 23 | |||||
getting
someone else to peel potato
|
4 | 0 | |||||
getting
someone else to help
|
9 | 8 | |||||
no
workable solution
|
6 | 4 | |||||
Commentary: The results achieved by Mäori students in general education (GEd) and Mäori immersion (MI) settings were not statistically significantly different. |