|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses 2008 ('04) |
||||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
Range
of sounds used: (loud/soft, long/short, high/low pitch, vocal/body) |
high | 1 (0) | 1 (5) | |||||||||||||
quite high | 15 (16) | 25 (21) | ||||||||||||||
moderate | 48 (41) | 47 (49) | ||||||||||||||
low | 36 (43) | 27 (25) | ||||||||||||||
Rhythmic
qualities: (asked for an interesting, catchy rhythm) |
strong | 5 (5) | 16 (23) | |||||||||||||
moderate | 41 (48) | 50 (45) | ||||||||||||||
weak | 54 (47) | 34 (32) | ||||||||||||||
Overall vitality/colour of performance: | strong | 7 (7) | 9 (12) | |||||||||||||
moderate | 44 (34) | 47 (46) | ||||||||||||||
weak | 49 (59) | 44 (42) | ||||||||||||||
Delivery: (co-ordination & presentation) | strong | 6 (7) | 15 (16) | |||||||||||||
moderate | 51 (41) | 50 (44) | ||||||||||||||
weak | 43 (52) | 35 (40) | ||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
7–9 | 5 (3) | 11 (12) | |||||||||||||
5–6 | 13 (14) | 21 (18) | ||||||||||||||
3–4 | 29 (28) | 29 (30) | ||||||||||||||
1–2 | 30 (27) | 18 (23) | ||||||||||||||
0 | 23 (28) | 21
(17) |
Commentary: |
About
10% more year 8 than year 4 teams performed strongly in terms of the
range of sounds used, the rhythmic qualities of their performance and
the co-ordination of their delivery. However, the two year levels performed
similarly in the vitality/colour of their performance. There was little
change in performance from 2004 to 2008. |