A
study of changes in mathematics achievement using data from
the first and second cycles of NEMP assessment |
| |
| |
|

6.
CHANGES IN ACHIEVEMENT FROM 1997 TO 2001
|
6.1 |
INTRODUCTION |
Information on student’s attitudes, interests and liking for mathematics
is given in the Mathematics
Survey chapter of the report. There are three sections which contain
comparison data from the 1997 and 2001 reports.
|
| 6.2 |
THREE FAVOURITES |
In
this section students were asked to select their three favourite school
subjects from a list of twelve subjects.
At year 4 there were no changes in the ranking of mathematics by students.
Mathematics was the third most popular subject choice, and the subject was
chosen as one of the three favourites by 42% of the students, in both 1997
and 2001.
At year 8, mathematics was also the third most popular choice in 1997, but
dropped to fourth in 2001 behind technology. In 1997, 35% of students included
mathematics in their three favourite subjects, but in 2001 this had dropped
to 26%.
|
| 6.3 |
MATHEMATICS ACTIVITIES STUDENTS LIKE DOING AT SCHOOL |
In
this section students were given a list of mathematical activities and asked
to nominate up to three that they liked doing at school. However, there
were thirteen activities to choose from in 1997 but only nine in 2001. Consequently
the percentage choices are not comparable.
|
| 6.4 |
MATHEMATICS SURVEY |
In
this section students were asked to respond positively or negatively on
a three or four point scale to statements designed to measure their enthusiasm
for, and self-confidence in, mathematics.
Of the eight items which were included in both the 1997 and 2001 assessments,
half seemed to be measuring enthusiasm and half self-confidence.
Two of the self-confidence items, involving how students thought their
teachers and parents perceived their mathematical ability, contained and
extra choice of don’t know.
In the question concerning teachers, 5% less students at year 4, and 9%
less at year 8, chose this option in 2001 compared to 1997. This reflects
well on teachers. There was very little change (1%) in the don’t
know responses to the question relating to parents.
Weighted means (on a four point scale, the most positive response was
multiplied by four, the next by three etc.) were calculated to indicate
the changes.
The tables below shows the weighted means for each of the items (1997
score in brackets) and whether the change was positive or negative.
| ENTHUSIASM |
|
|
|
| ITEM |
SCALE
SIZE |
WEIGHTED
MEAN |
 |
 |
YEAR
4 |
YEAR
8 |
|
|
Would
you like to do more, the same
or less maths at school? |
3
|
2.15(2.18)- |
1.85(1.91)- |
|
How much do you like doing maths at school? |
4 |
3.23(3.28)-
|
2.81(2.91)- |
| How
much do you like doing maths in your own time (not at school)? |
4
|
2.73(2.89)- |
2.04(2.28)- |
| Do
you want to keep learning maths when you grow up? |
3
|
2.43(2.49)-
|
2.32(2.39)- |
 |
There is a small
but consistent decline in enthusiasm at both levels.
| SELF-CONFIDENCE |
|
|
|
| ITEM |
SCALE
SIZE |
WEIGHTED
MEAN |
 |
 |
YEAR
4 |
YEAR
8 |
|
|
| How
good do you think you are at maths? |
4
|
3.23(3.23)
|
2.98(2.84)+ |
| How
good does your teacher think you are at maths? |
4
|
3.51(3.41)+
|
3.05(3.08)- |
| How
good does your Mum or Dad think you are at maths? |
4
|
3.69(3.61)+
|
3.35(3.17)+ |
| How
do you feel about doing things in maths you haven’t tried before?
|
4
|
3.12(2.86)+
|
2.96(2.92)+ |
 |
Again, the changes are small but self-confidence does seem to have increased.
|
| 6.5 |
CONCLUSIONS |
The
changes indicated by the data are:
| w |
Mathematics
was less popular in 2001, compared to other school subjects, among
year 8 students. |
| w |
Fewer students
at both year levels said they did not know how good their teacher
thought they were at mathematics. |
| w |
At both year
levels there were indications of a small decrease in enthusiasm for
mathematics. |
| w |
At both year
levels there were indications of a small increase in self-confidence
in mathematics. |
|
|
next
page
|
 |
| top
of page | return
to Probe Studies - INDEX | return
to Probe Studies menu |
 |
| For
further information and contact details for the Author
| Contact USEE |