CRITICAL, CREATIVE, REFLECTIVE AND LOGICAL THINKING IN THE NEMP ASSESSMENTS

2. METHODOLOGY

2.1 INTRODUCTION

All of the 711 tasks in the NEMP assessments from 1995 to 2003 were examined to identify tasks, or sub-tasks, which seemed to involve critical, creative, reflective, or logical thinking. 159 tasks were identified.

The marking criteria used to assess student performance on 52 of these tasks were then considered to evaluate the extent to which any potential to evaluate these kinds of thinking was realised in the assessment. The choice of tasks for this part of the research was made to ensure a spread across curriculum areas and thinking types. The relationship between the marking criteria for the tasks and the reporting of student performance was then considered.

Each of the kinds of thinking were then considered in turn, looking for similarities and differences in the tasks, and the assessment, across the curriculum.

The tasks which were presented in a format corresponding to that suggested by Halpern and, consequently having greater potential for assessing thinking were then identified.

Finally consideration was given to the possibility of future research using the video tapes of student responses.

   
2.2 INTENDED OUTCOME
A better understanding of the place of critical, creative, reflective and logical thinking both in the NEMP assessments and in the classroom.
   
2.3 USE EXPECTED TO BE MADE OF THE OUTCOMES
   
(a) The findings may be useful to:
 
NEMP in designing further tasks to assess thinking skills.
Teachers who wish to encourage and assess thinking skills in their classrooms.
(b) It is hoped that the report will be followed by further research looking at the video evidence of students attempting some of the tasks.
     
2.4 ASSESSMENT RESULTS FOR MAORI STUDENTS
The assessments of Maori students reported from 1999 - 2002 used a selection of tasks taken from the general assessments. Consequently, no separate analysis of tasks was necessary. However, the thinking tasks which were in the Maori assessments were recorded and a comparison with the general assessments made.

prev page / next page

top of page    |    return to Probe Studies - INDEX   |    return to Other Studies menu
For further information and contact details for the Author    |    Contact USEE