|
|
||||||||||||||||
Focus: Giving an interesting talk on a topic. | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses
2000 ('96) |
||||||||||||||||
y4
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Relevance of content to topic |
strong
|
44
(32)
|
|||||||||||||
moderate
|
40
(48)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
16
(20)
|
|||||||||||||||
Coherence
of presentation does it hang together? |
strong
|
29
(17)
|
||||||||||||||
moderate
|
46
(56)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
25
(27)
|
|||||||||||||||
Degree of interest stimulated |
strong
|
23
(13)
|
||||||||||||||
moderate
|
46
(56)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
31
(31)
|
|||||||||||||||
Speech clarity |
strong
|
49
(50)
|
||||||||||||||
moderate
|
38
(40)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
13
(10)
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
score:
|
7
8
|
28
(17)
|
||||||||||||||
5
6
|
28
(28)
|
|||||||||||||||
3
4
|
21
(32)
|
|||||||||||||||
0
2
|
23
(23)
|
|||||||||||||||
Commentary: About half of the year 4 students were judged to speak clearly and select relevant material, but only about a quarter of the students managed coherent and/or interesting talks. About 10 percent more students succeeded well in 2000 than in 1996. The year 8 task, Talk Topics used the same procedures but different topics. |
||||||||||||||||