|
|
||||||||||||||||
Focus: Giving an interesting talk on a topic. | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses
2000 ('96) |
||||||||||||||||
y8
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Relevance of content to topic |
strong
|
72
(73)
|
|||||||||||||
moderate
|
20
(23)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
8
(4)
|
|||||||||||||||
Coherence
of presentation does it hang together? |
strong
|
36
(29)
|
||||||||||||||
moderate
|
46
(54)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
18
(17)
|
|||||||||||||||
Degree of interest stimulated |
strong
|
26
(24)
|
||||||||||||||
moderate
|
48
(45)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
26
(31)
|
|||||||||||||||
Speech clarity |
strong
|
56
(51)
|
||||||||||||||
moderate
|
37
(42)
|
|||||||||||||||
weak
|
7
(7)
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
score:
|
7
8
|
31
(26)
|
||||||||||||||
5 6
|
39
(41)
|
|||||||||||||||
3
4
|
19
(24)
|
|||||||||||||||
0
2
|
11
(9)
|
|||||||||||||||
Commentary:
Most of the year 8 students selected relevant material for their talk, but only about half of them were judged to speak clearly, a third of them to present a coherent talk, and a quarter of them to stimulate interest in the topic. Slightly more students succeeded well in 2000 than in 1996. The year 4 task Talk Time used the same procedures but different topics. |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||