Approach: One
to one |
Level:
4 &
8
|
|
Focus:
Explaining
and expressing opinions
|
Resources:
Cue card |
|
76kb |
|
|
Questions/instructions:
In this activity
you will imagine that a friend has asked you what you have been
doing when you come to these sessions. You might like to tell them
why you are doing NEMP activities, what you liked the most, and
any of the things you didn’t like very much.
You can have a few moments to think about what you would tell a
friend about NEMP. This card reminds you of things you might like
to talk about.
Give cue card to student. Allow time. |
Explaining
NEMP |
•
|
Why were
you doing these activities? |
•
|
What
activities did you like? Why? |
•
|
What
activities didn’t you like? Why? |
|
|
|
%
responses
|
y4
|
y8 |
1.
What would you tell your friend about NEMP?
prompt: Can you tell me more about that? |
|
|
|
|
|
To
what extent did the student explain the
general purpose of NEMP? |
|
|
substantially
|
4 |
25 |
somewhat
|
23 |
43 |
very
little/not at all |
73 |
32 |
To
what extent did the student explain
about the different session types? |
|
|
more
than two types |
1 |
7 |
one
or two types |
6
|
11 |
not
at all |
93 |
82 |
To
what extent did the student identify and
describe tasks that he/she particularly enjoyed |
|
|
more
than one task described in detail |
4
|
6 |
more
than one task mentioned, not in detail |
21 |
21 |
one
task, described in detail |
9
|
10 |
one
task just mentioned or general comments |
43 |
41 |
no
tasks mentioned |
23 |
22 |
To
what extent did the student explain why
he/she enjoyed one or more tasks? |
|
|
well
justified |
16
|
18 |
somewhat
justified |
58 |
63 |
not
at all |
26
|
19 |
To
what extent did the student identify and
describe tasks that he/she didn’t like: |
|
|
more
than one task described in detail |
0 |
1 |
more
than one task mentioned, not in detail |
4 |
7 |
one
task, described in detail |
3 |
6 |
one
task just mentioned or general comments |
46 |
52 |
no
tasks mentioned |
47 |
34 |
To
what extent did the student explain why
he/she did not enjoy one or more tasks: |
|
|
well
justified |
10 |
18 |
somewhat
justified |
30
|
43 |
not
at all |
60
|
39 |
|
76
|
83 |
moderate
|
21
|
15 |
weak
|
3 |
2 |
Clarity
of expression of individual comments: |
strong
|
|
61
|
71 |
moderate
|
29 |
26 |
weak
|
10 |
3 |
Organisation/flow
of explanation: |
strong
|
|
28 |
47 |
moderate
|
51 |
44 |
weak
|
21
|
9 |
Overall
quality of description of NEMP: |
high
|
|
0 |
7 |
quite
high |
16 |
32 |
moderate
|
57 |
50 |
weak
|
27
|
11 |
Total
score: 20–25
|
0 |
2 |
16–19
|
4 |
13 |
12–15
|
17 |
30 |
8–11
|
47
|
38 |
4–7
|
23 |
14 |
0–3
|
9 |
3 |
Commentary:
Compared to
year 4 students, year 8 students demonstrated much better understanding
of the general purpose of NEMP and organised their comments more effectively.
In most other respects, differences were minor. |