Kea Magic
Loading Images
Approach:  Group
ACCESS
Level: Year 4 and year 8
Focus: Reading aloud effectively for an audience  
Resources:
5 copies of the play, "Special Performance" card
244Kb
Questions/instructions:  


In this activity your team is going to read a play called Kea Magic. Try to make it sound as interesting and realistic as you can. You don’t have to do any acting unless you want to.

The play is about trying to keep a kea safe by making it invisible. But being invisible turns out to be not much fun.
So then they have to think of a way to make it visible again.

Here are the copies of the play. [Student1] is Kea, [Student 2] is Grandma, [Student 3] is Fantail and [Student 4] is Tui.

[Click here for YEAR 4 version | Click here for YEAR 8 version]

Give each student a copy of the play. Allocate the parts.

First practise reading the play together.
Remain with the group to help with any words.

Now talk about how to make it sound really good. Think of ways to use your voices to make the play seem real. After you’ve practised it twice you will do it again for a special recording on the video. You can stand and move around if you want.
Withdraw from the group. Allow time to practise the play twice.

Now it’s time to do your best performance of the play.
Wave ‘Special Performance’ card.

 
% responses
2008 ('04)
y4
y8
Expressiveness in relation to context:
(capturing the feel of the part)
strong
57 (59)
58 (59)
moderate
33 (35)
35 (33)
weak
10 (6)
7 (8)
Timing, continuity:
strong
67 (68)
86 (86)
moderate
29 (30)
13 (13)
weak
4 (2)
1 (1)
Fluency within individual speeches:
strong
55 (58)
69 (73)
moderate
39 (38)
29 (26)
weak
6 (4)
2 (1)
Accuracy:
strong
77 (76)
81 (84)
moderate
19 (24)
18 (15)
weak
4 (0)
1 (1)
Speech clarity:
strong
75 (82)
78 (76)
moderate
22 (17)
20 (22)
weak
3 (1)
2 (2)

Total score:
10
38 (45)
44 (51)
9
15 (10)
21 (17)
8
17 (13)
14 (9)
7
9 (13)
7 (9)
0–6
21 (19)
14 (14)
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] :
Year 4


Year 8


Commentary:
As with some other speaking tasks, year 4 students performed comparably to year 8 students in expressiveness, but lower in their co-ordination with other performers. There was little change between 2004 and 2008. On average, girls did markedly better than boys, and Pakeha students than Mäori and Pasifika students.