|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
%
responses 2009 ('05) |
|||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
||||||||||||||
1. Why do you think this was shown on the news? | |||||||||||||||
lots of people and animals were killed | 30 | ||||||||||||||
event was dramatic and scary | 73 | ||||||||||||||
happened
in Australia which is close to New Zealand (and lots of New Zealanders live there) |
23 | ||||||||||||||
2. If you were a reporter, who would you want to interview to get different views about what happened? | |||||||||||||||
victims | 88 | ||||||||||||||
relatives/friends
of people affected |
31 | ||||||||||||||
emergency
services people who tried to control fire and/or clean up afterwards
|
56 | ||||||||||||||
government
or local officials |
10 | ||||||||||||||
fire expert | 4 | ||||||||||||||
3. What questions would you ask? | |||||||||||||||
Questions would invite responses that would tell about: | what happened | 62 | |||||||||||||
immediate effects on people | 56 | ||||||||||||||
longer term consequences | 18 | ||||||||||||||
4. If you were still a reporter in a year’s time, what questions might you ask in a follow up story on the Australian bushfires? | |||||||||||||||
Questions would invite responses that would tell about: | re-establishing in same place | 32 | |||||||||||||
choosing other places to live | 8 | ||||||||||||||
replacing possessions other than homes | 6 | ||||||||||||||
issues
of physical/mental health and happiness |
43 | ||||||||||||||
issues
of policy and strategy for dealing with fires like this |
15 | ||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
10–13 |
4 | |||||||||||||
8–9
|
13 | ||||||||||||||
6–7
|
32 | ||||||||||||||
4–5
|
35 | ||||||||||||||
0–3 | 16 |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
Year
8 students performed fairly well on this task. This is in strong contrast
to the companion task given to year 4 students (p35). Here we see students
being much more successful at coming up with ideas as to why the story
was shown on television and at generating good questions to ask. Few
Mäori students scored well, while the performance of
Pasifika students varied markedly. |