|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses 2009 ('05) |
||||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
1. Do you think that the National Anthem should always be sung in these two languages? | ||||||||||||||||
yes | 90 (91) | 96 (99) | ||||||||||||||
no | 10 (9) | 4 (1) | ||||||||||||||
2. Why do you say that? | ||||||||||||||||
Explanation for “yes”: | relating to thebicultural nature of New Zealand society | 41 (39) | 72 (72) | |||||||||||||
Explanation for “no”: | suggesting choice of language depending on who is present | 4 (2) | 3 (1) | |||||||||||||
argument for always using only English or Mäori | 4 (5) | 3 (1) | ||||||||||||||
weak
or no response 51 (54) 22 (26) |
||||||||||||||||
Strength of justification: | strong
8 (10) 27 (31) |
|||||||||||||||
moderate
32 (28) 44 (40) |
||||||||||||||||
weak 60 (62) 29 (29) | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
yes,
one or more of the languages |
30 (25) | 11 (8) | ||||||||||||||
4. Why do you say that? | no | 70 (75) | 89 (92) | |||||||||||||
Quality of reasoning: | (e.g. “yes”,
because lots of people in New Zealand speak these languages or “no”, because most people just speak English or Mäori and these languages reflect New Zealand history better) good |
16 (20) | 39 (41) | |||||||||||||
limited
|
67 (61) | 57 (51) | ||||||||||||||
no reasoning | 17 (19) | 4 (8) | ||||||||||||||
5. When might you hear the national anthem being sung? | ||||||||||||||||
school (e.g. assembly) | 64 (58) | 68 (58) | ||||||||||||||
sporting occasions, such as test matches | 60 (83) | 87 (89) | ||||||||||||||
community events (e.g. meetings, concerts, visits by important people, tangi) | 35 (25) | 39 (35) | ||||||||||||||
special annual occasions, such as Waitangi Day and ANZAC Day | 6 (6) | 11 (13) | ||||||||||||||
6. Why do you think we have a national anthem? | ||||||||||||||||
Aspects mentioned: | [• for
New Zealanders -to share identity/pride • for other people - to recognise New Zealand events or achievements] |
|||||||||||||||
presented
both aspects well |
1 (0) | 2 (4) | ||||||||||||||
presented
one aspect well and the other vaguely |
2 (0) | 3 (3) | ||||||||||||||
presented
one aspect well |
14 (12) | 29 (17) | ||||||||||||||
presented
both aspects vaguely |
3 (4) | 7 (4) | ||||||||||||||
presented one aspect vaguely | 37 (42) | 43 (42) | ||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
7–9
|
1 (1) | 11 (9) | |||||||||||||
5–6
|
11 (9) | 25 (22) | ||||||||||||||
4
|
10 (13) | 20 (16) | ||||||||||||||
3
|
18 (19) | 20 (21) | ||||||||||||||
2
|
26 (24) | 17
(17) |
||||||||||||||
0–1 | 34 (34) | 7 (15) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
Very
high proportions of both year 4 and year 8 students felt that the national
anthem should be sung in both English and Mäori, with more year
8 than year 4 students being able to articulate well the bicultural
nature of New Zealand society as a reason. There were only slight differences
between the year levels in identifying where one might hear the national
anthem, with school and sporting occasions being the most common. However,
students at both year 4 and 8 could not explain well why we have a
national anthem. There was no meaningful change in this pattern from
2005 to 2009. |