|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses 2008 ('04) |
||||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
1. Which lemon squeezer do you think worked best? | ||||||||||||||||
4 |
25 (24) |
29 (25) |
||||||||||||||
3 |
52 (58) |
53 (60) |
||||||||||||||
2 |
5 (7) |
4 (4) |
||||||||||||||
1 |
17 (12) |
14 (10) |
||||||||||||||
2. What were the things that made it the best lemon squeezer? | ||||||||||||||||
gets lots of juice |
41 (34) |
46 (38) |
||||||||||||||
stops pips getting into juice |
37 (41) |
59 (63) |
||||||||||||||
easy to use and/or not tiring |
39 (58) |
56 (62) |
||||||||||||||
not too messy to use |
7 (6) |
9 (13) |
||||||||||||||
Total
score: |
4 |
0 (0) |
1 (1) |
|||||||||||||
3 |
4 (9) |
15 (13) |
||||||||||||||
2 |
31 (33) |
42 (49) |
||||||||||||||
1 |
50 (46) |
35 (32) |
||||||||||||||
0 |
15 (12) |
6 (5) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |
About one third of year 4 students and three fifths of year 8 students were able to provide at least two sound reasons behind their choice of a lemon squeezer. Differences between year 4 and year 8 were not particularly large. There were minimal gender differences. Performance was similar in 2004 and 2008.
|