|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
%
responses 2008 ('04) |
||||||||||||||||
y4 |
y8 |
|||||||||||||||
First piece of equipment: | ||||||||||||||||
Met the criteria: | quite well (had exercise potential, did fit cage and appeared interesting) |
15 (16) |
31 (26) |
|||||||||||||
somewhat (had some exercise potential
and did fit cage) |
49 (58) |
53 (58) |
||||||||||||||
did not meet the criteria (did not fit cage or
provided wheel already given) |
36 (26) |
16 (16) |
||||||||||||||
Clarity of use of equipment: | equipment identified and explained |
13 (25) |
38 (35) |
|||||||||||||
equipment identified or explained |
41 (46) |
38 (49) |
||||||||||||||
Clarity of the construction and mechanisms involved: |
high |
9 (10) |
29 (25) |
|||||||||||||
moderate |
34 (37) |
42 (43) |
||||||||||||||
low |
57 (53) |
29 (32) |
||||||||||||||
Second piece of equipment: | ||||||||||||||||
Met the criteria: | quite well (had exercise potential, did fit cage and appeared interesting) |
10 (8) |
27 (17) |
|||||||||||||
somewhat (had some exercise potential
and did fit cage) |
51 (57) |
48 (58) |
||||||||||||||
did not meet the criteria (did not fit cage or
provided wheel already given) |
40 (35) |
26 (25) |
||||||||||||||
Clarity of use of equipment: | equipment identified and explained |
10 (19) |
30 (25) |
|||||||||||||
equipment identified or explained |
35 (42) |
38 (47) |
||||||||||||||
Clarity of the construction and
mechanisms involved: |
high |
3 (7) |
20 (15) |
|||||||||||||
moderate |
32 (30) |
39 (38) |
||||||||||||||
low |
65 (63) |
42 (47) |
||||||||||||||
Total score: IMPORTANT NOTE: |
9–12 |
5 (9) |
27 (21) |
|||||||||||||
7–8 |
10 (13) |
16 (18) |
||||||||||||||
5–6 |
19 (24) |
21 (23) |
||||||||||||||
3–4 |
24 (20) |
16 (24) |
||||||||||||||
0–2 |
43 (35) |
20 (14) |
Subgroup Analysis [Click on charts to enlarge] : |
Commentary: |