|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
%
responses 2007 ('03) |
|||||||||||||
y4 |
y8
|
|||||||||||||
Posed questions about: | inspiration/reason for making vessel,
what its intended use is, who it is for,
what it is intended to “say” |
31 (27) |
58 (58) |
|||||||||||
why it has that particular shape,
those colours and other
decorative features |
37 (32) |
44 (38) |
||||||||||||
the materials used in making it |
40 (34) |
28 (24) |
||||||||||||
the techniques used in making it |
73 (71) |
65 (68) |
||||||||||||
how satisfied the artist is with the result |
5 (3) |
6 (6) |
||||||||||||
Overall rating of mix and
quality of questions: (likely richness of information resulting) |
very strong |
2 (2) |
4 (6) |
|||||||||||
quite strong |
16 (21) |
26 (30) |
||||||||||||
moderate |
57 (54) |
51 (44) |
||||||||||||
weak or any other response |
24 (24) |
19 (20) |
||||||||||||
Total
score: |
3
|
2 (2) |
4 (6) |
|||||||||||
2 |
16 (21) |
26 (30) |
||||||||||||
1 |
57 (54) |
51 (44) |
||||||||||||
0 |
24 (24) |
19 (20) |
Subgroup Analysis: |
Commentary: |
Students had some difficulty in generating questions for a potter after watching a short video about her work. Growth from year 4 to year 8 was modest, with year 4 students focused more on issues of materials and technique, whereas year 8 students asked more about the nature and purpose of the pottery. Pasifika students were less likely to do well on this task than Pakeha or Mäori students at both year 4 and year 8. Gender differences were quite small. Performance was similar at both year levels in 2003 and 2007. |
|