Although
the linguistic analysis in this probe study provides more information
than is needed by classroom teachers, there are valuable points
that would enable teachers to improve the ability of their students
to give mathematical explanations.
Primary
among these is to encourage their students to talk mathematics rather
than just doing it. This advice is not new. It is an underpinning
of the New Zealand Numeracy Project (Ministry of Education, 2004)
as well as the NCTM Standards (2000) and several research projects
(for example Khisty and Chval, 2002). Talking mathematics provides
an opportunity for students to formulate their own understanding,
explain it to their peers and explain their understanding to their
teachers.
The
major linguistic structures identified here, Premise, Consequence,
and Conclusion, can be used in many types of mathematical discussion.
This can be discussion among peers, with a teacher, and in writing.
Evaluation of discussion in mathematics classes can be guided by
seeing whether or not the appropriate elements are present. Teachers
can guide students by asking them to explain in complete sentences,
explain what they already know, what alternatives might eventuate,
and what can be concluded from different outcomes. This structure
can be applied to numerical investigations, algebraic comparisons,
investigations involving statistics and probability, and geometric
and measurement hypotheses and investigations. Not only are they
useful for all strands of the curriculum, but for both primary and
secondary students. Students taking the National Certificate of
Educational Achievement will need to be able to write explanations
including these components in order to achieve Excellence.
Primary
school students need to be helped to tell the difference between
a story appropriate for reading, writing or fantasy and one appropriate
for mathematics. Many current pedagogical practices make this differentiation
more difficult for children, for example calling equations “number
sentences” and calling word problems “story problems”. This does
not mean that fun and fantasy need to be removed from mathematics.
Exercises in the size of a giant's hands or cloths are both fun
and mathematically useful exercises in proportion. However, the
subject of a mathematical explanation for this as well as for other
mathematical tasks is a clear explanation involving stating a Premise,
Consequence and Conclusion. |