THE EFFECTS OF TEACHER PERCEPTIONS ON ADOPTING A NEW ROLE

a1.10 Feedback

In the previous section it was mentioned that NEMP staff watched video tape from the first week of administrating. At the end of each week of administrating in schools, the administrators send completed video tapes and paper work of assessment data to NEMP in Dunedin. NEMP staff viewed sections of each administrator working with students at the end of the first week. Feedback is then given by NEMP staff to each administrator. This feedback took the form of a general newsletter to all administrators which included: general reminders of things that administrators should be doing, for example, following the script and procedures in the manual consistently, supplies being set out before commencing each task; administrative issues that cause common problems, for example, labelling tapes correctly, checking the microphone is working, ensuring that the completion sheets are filled in correctly. Information relating to administering specific tasks correctly is included in this section if necessary. The teacher administrators also received specific feedback on their administration. The feedback was important to administrators as it provided them with a link to the NEMP staff and reassured them that they have interpreted the role correctly. If an administrator's performance required immediate attention, a member of the NEMP staff contacted them by telephone. Most administrators received feedback by the end of the second week, which enabled them to focus on any issues and implement changes by the third week of administrating. Some NEMP staff identified a need to be in contact with administrators before this:
 
NEMP3:
 
I would like to put a call through to each pair in first week…24 pairs- viable; could be shared around. It's a pastoral care function…it's a harsh break from the training week to being out there. You can see during training week that some of the pairs might want or need more personal contact. A phone call gives the TAs an opportunity to talk about what went well and any concerns or difficulties they may have. Not everyone rings, and it is a mistake to assume that hearing nothing means that all is well…

NEMP2:

I would like to get, maybe…the report back to the TA's…you know how they get a report on their performance… and it doesn't arrive until the second week, which means it's not effective until the third week… so it's a matter of seeing how they're going earlier on. If I'm very concerned I ring up, as quickly as I can, though sometimes they're not too keen on that, to get their first phone call, “Oh, you're doing this wrong…”, is not too good for them, but that worries me a little bit. It's often not until the third week that a problem is picked up on… and sorted out. And I think that people like (NEMP staff member) even find that with the returns and all that sort of thing, that things haven't been returned the way they should…he's in the same situation and he gets quite uptight in the first two weeks, but by the third, you know, hopefully it's sorted out.
       
Administrators look forward to receiving feedback and having their work corroborated and getting suggestions for improvement. However, the feedback sent out received a variety of responses:
TAJ14: Really appreciated the feedback
TAJ2: It was great to get the NEMP feedback…but know my administrating has lapses. Trying to head to consistency! Newsletter was great too.
         

For some administrators the feedback confirmed that they were performing well in their new role, reinforcing the skills and ideas that they had learned. Administrators who were aware of inconsistencies in their execution of the role also welcomed the reminders and reinforcement.

However, it was important that feedback was accurate in order to be meaningful. There were some situations where teachers felt that they were fulfilling certain aspects of their role that were subject to critical comment on their feedback sheets. However, even if they disagreed with the feedback given, it still served to focus the administrator's attention onto particular aspects of their role:

TAJ6: My partner and I both got feedback sheets in the post on Friday and were quite disheartened by them, as we have been striving to administer to an excellent standard. Both of us were advised that our 'relationships with children' needed attention. We were perplexed as the children have seemed happy, relaxed and reluctant to finish sessions. We were told not to rush into tasks before greeting children. We thought markers would realize greeting and informal discussion had taken place prior to pushing 'record'. We were trying to avoid making markers sit through irrelevant stuff!
         
For many teachers the feedback enabled them to focus on skills and ideas that they had forgotten or needed to consolidate in order to perform their new role successfully:
TAJ5: The feedback I received was mostly positive - I was relieved. The few suggestions I have been given with regard to language proved useful and I am mindful of this as I interact with students.
TAJ3: Although I dreaded the feedback form and am cross with myself for missing reading the instructions properly, it was good to be picked up on it, even though I felt foolish. The feedback was positive too…it encourages you to continue to aspire to be the best you can.
         
A number of administrators did not receive their feedback until after several weeks of administrating. This was often the case when administrators were working away from home for several weeks in a row and did not return home at the weekends. In these instances teachers were frustrated when they found that they were performing their role inadequately and had continued to do so for some time. Teachers expressed a desire to work effectively in the administrator role and welcomed information that enabled them to adopt this role successfully:
TAJ10: I didn't go home at the end of week 2 and therefore didn't get my feedback in the mail until the end of week 3, and that's over half (the time) that I've been doing things wrong and didn't know. I will have to work really hard to get it right for the last 2 schools.
TM5: It would have been useful to have the feedback sent to the next school that we were going to. I didn't get mine until week 4 as I didn't go back home until then, and I would have liked to have received it sooner.
         
It appears from comments made by administrators that feedback on their performance was important to them, to reassure or identify areas of concern in regard to aspects of their performance, so that they could confirm their perceptions of their role. It would therefore be beneficial for administrators to have had the opportunity to practice their role and receive feedback on their performance as they are learning about the role, during their training week, to acknowledge good technique and help them identify areas that need to be improved. This was suggested by administrators when they identified the sort of practice they required that would help them to perform more confidently in their new role. For example:
TAJ13: Thinking about what I could be better prepared for…it's like we should have done a few practice runs, and been observed and given feedback during the training…it would have been useful. You don't realize you do things unless you are told or you watch yourself on video.
         

Learning is facilitated by regular ongoing feedback. Thus, feedback during training would enable teachers to develop and refine their competence with administrating before they are placed in the situation 'for real'. Research conducted on the role of experiential learning, especially in adult education (Dorn, 1989; Knowles 1977; Petranek, 1994) has shown that receiving feedback from different perspectives during participatory methods of learning helps to anchor content and transform behaviour. It also develops positive peer support through the group's sharing of experiences, positive comments and practical suggestions. Having had the opportunity to receive feedback from their tutors and their peers and to give feedback to others, may mean that administrators are better equipped to monitor their own performance and also to provide constructive feedback to their partner in the field. This may also help to alleviate some of the partnership issues between administrators.

After viewing the video from the first week of administrating, any feedback subsequently provided by NEMP staff to administrators would be easier to give, as administrators would be used to receiving constructive feedback by this point. It would be worth posting written feedback to the next school that the administrators are to work in, as suggested by one administrator. This would avoid the difficulties of not receiving mail that some administrators experience if they are working out of their area and do not return home at weekends

The proposal to put a phone call through to teacher administrators during their first week could produce results similar to the 'Hawthorne effect'. The Hawthorne effect refers to the phenomenon that mere attention to employees can increase the quality of performance. It was the result of a series of experiments conducted at Western Electric's Hawthorne Works, in Illinois, which found that attention given to workers (in this case by researchers) was perceived as respect and interest in their activities and performance. Consequently, their performance in their working role improved (Mayo, 1933). This effect has had various interpretations, but there is a consensus that human beings perform at higher levels when they are being attended to respectfully by a perceived 'authority'. The time spent on a telephone call to each administrator partnership may be time well spent if it produces similar effects to those recorded.

         
a1.11 The practical use of ICT equipment and the assessment process

The need to be competent and confident with ICT equipment had been perceived by teachers as being important during various stages of the training and administration process (Sections 1.2, 1.3, 1.7). The use of ICT equipment is essential in NEMP assessment. Some of the assessment tasks are implemented using a computer, in order to provide variation in the delivery of tasks and in the way students respond to tasks. Many of the assessment procedures are videotaped so that data that can be analysed and marked at a later date. Teacher administrators must learn to use these technologies and incorporate them into their interactions with students. Learning the skills of using ICT equipment is seen as a priority by teachers, prior to commencing their training. This is shown in Figure 4, Section 2.

NEMP staff indicate that learning about and using the ICT equipment is always perceived by teachers as a challenge:

NEMP1: The part that teachers every year say is one of the most daunting and challenging bits is the toys department; the cameras and the video recorders; that throws a lot of teachers, and I can understand that. I mean teachers do not spend a lot of time behind video cameras, and using computers in classrooms.
NEMP2: The computer, video camera, that's the one they tend to come to me about… electronics… “What happens if I don't record, or have no tape”…that's what really worries them…
NEMP3: Physical equipment…computer and video they definitely find difficult. There is a wide range of skills that teachers bring. Also, our equipment is old… computers Mac., and our videos are not digital. There is also time pressure on equipment sessions.
         
Administrators identified the use of ICT equipment as one of the three most important skills they developed during their training week (Figure 5). For some administrators, ICT equipment was one of the difficulties they encountered in implementing their TA role effectively (Figure 10). In Questionnaire 3, teachers indicated that the use of ICT equipment is an area that they would like to have more training on. This is shown in Figure 11 below.
However, they were specific as to the sort of practice they required that would enable them to use the equipment more confidently:
TA8-14: …I felt that a lot of emphasis was placed on recording, and a lot of the data depends on recording, so I felt that we should be able to record it, and then play it back to see. Because what we're going to do now is go out there and record stuff…we've only recorded a little bit at a time… but if we've done like 5 minutes or 6 minutes of it with our partner, then we would have felt more comfortable.
TAJ25: Perhaps we should have practiced more with a tape in the camera. I did practice at home before week one, but there was no tape in the camera. Maybe the TA trainees could watch a video of different set ups and where the camera is placed, because part of the reason for the mistake I made was that I had not set the room up well.
TAJ13: Thinking about what I could be better prepared for…it's like we should have done a few practice runs, and been observed and given feedback during the training…it would have been useful. You don't realize you do things unless you are told or you watch yourself on video. Maybe we could spend some time on Friday looking at some of the tapes done that week and analyse strengths and weaknesses.
         
In order to develop confidence using the equipment in an authentic situation, there were suggestions for the need to role play an assessment situation in order for administrators to go through the procedure of setting up the equipment and using it appropriately. In Questionnaire three, teachers were asked to suggest ways that they felt they could be prepared more effectively to work as an administrator. The idea of role playing was identified by a number of teacher administrators in order to help them grasp the implementation of a variety of aspects of their role. This is shown in Figure 12 below.
Comments to support this idea include:
TA8-8: I would have liked to experiment a bit more, with probably…and I don't know how you'd do it…we talked about it this afternoon, whether you could have children, but then we decided on sort of a mock up situation more. Today we had a mock up situation where we were the students and we sat down on the floor and we did a group situation. And had we not done that we wouldn't have asked the sort of questions. Until you're put in a situation… you have a feeling…if it's just read and you read through it, you don't see some things until you get down and actually do it
TA8-13:

The other thing I would have liked was if there had been a role play. If the lecturers, our teachers as it were, if they'd actually done, right at the beginning, if they'd said, “Right we're going to look at the 1-1…” and actually showed us right from, “take the sticker out, stick it on that child's book”… if that could have been done for each area, I would have felt better. Rather than it being broken up into “now these are the task questions” and a couple of days letter “now this is the administration for that”… So I thought it could have been better put together. It would have helped me, anyway.

I'd have felt happier if I could have put all the pieces together, and given that a run through…that would have helped me.

Even better would have been one of the lecturers spending 5 or 10 minutes with each of us, if that was possible, use them as a student and then some feedback that said “well you could have done this…or I couldn't understand what you said”, you know. That would have been good, rather than waiting for the first week to go by and then looking at tapes… it might have been an idea to find some time to do that.

TA8-7: More time ON the tasks, I know we spent a lot of time on the tasks; it's been good but it's been a little superficial in a way. I probably would have liked to do them rather than just sit there and look through them with a partner, but to actually do them in a group situation. It puts us on the spot a bit but it is a good way to learn.
TM5: I think that you need to role play in order to be familiar with the script and equipment before using it with students. You need to be familiar with equipment use and comfortable with being on video.
         

The administrator role was complex, requiring the interweaving of a number of new skills into those that the teacher already possessed. Several administrators had identified the need to role play the administrator role in order to develop a better understanding of the role and consequently to be more effective in implementing it. Role playing is practice; by doing something as though it were for real, the learner gets to think, feel and act at the same time, developing a comprehensive and global understanding of the situation (Shaw, Corsini, Blake & Mouton, 1980: 2). It is a technique that is used to provide learners with knowledge and skills by allowing them to experience a nearly real situation and providing them with feedback information, to better understand themselves and their behaviour and increase their effectiveness in various situations (Shaw, et al 1980: 1). It involves realistic behaviours under unrealistic conditions. When learners are asked to do something with the learning material that they have read or heard about they are provided with an opportunity to acquire a fuller knowledge and understanding of the new information. Role playing is now recognised as a valuable procedure whenever people need to understand a situation better or be more effective in dealing with it. One of the most important aspects of role playing is that it provides a simulated reality experience in which a complete skill can be rehearsed without hurting oneself or others through failure (Shaw, et al 1980: 2-8).

Although trainee administrators may appear to have an understanding of the administrator role from reading and discussion, there is often a difference between 'knowing that' and 'knowing how'. Shaw et al (1980: 8) suggest that there is often a discrepancy between what a person knows and how they behave. Role playing can be helpful in encouraging changes in behaviour, either through the opportunity for practicing a new behaviour or through the use of feedback. Administrators acknowledged the need for feedback to enable them to modify existing behaviour to accommodate the new role.

Role playing also puts the emphasis on personal concerns or problems. Often training procedures can be too abstract or too general, or they focus on hypothetical or typical problems. Through role play relevant, personal concerns can be identified and addressed through feedback and reflection (Shaw, et al 1980: 21). This was certainly acknowledged by the administrator who commented, “And had we not done that we wouldn't have asked the sort of questions. Until you're put in a situation… you have a feeling…if it's just read or you read through it, you don't see some things until you get down and actually do it” (TA8-8).

         
a1.12 Viewing video scenarios
Figure 12 in Section 1.11, shows suggestions made by teachers on how to enhance their role performance. The suggestions included areas they would like more training on and strategies that could enhance their skills and understanding of the administrator role. Several administrators identified the need to view video recordings of NEMP assessment procedures in order to clarify their understanding of the role. Viewing video recordings was also identified as being useful for providing examples of how to set up the administration. Comments to support these ideas included:
TA8-3: One thing I'd have liked to have done was seen some good models; so maybe video of teachers showing good practice in their role for the different areas. Maybe in the middle of the week or towards the end of the week, show a couple of teachers performing the tasks with excerpts to show how they go about the process, the prompting, how to get the most out of the kids; that would have been really powerful, I think.
TA4-4: Spending more time with setting up your area, how you might have your equipment (on the side, at a table). Maybe seeing video clips that show this …seeing how the administration is set up rather than just seeing the interview.
TA4-7: I would have liked a holistic overview…I likened it to a jigsaw; I like to see the picture before I start. On the first day we had a bit of this and a bit of that but I wasn't quite sure of the whole picture
         
Teacher markers, who had been through the training and administration process and then subsequently participated in the marking process, also reiterated these ideas:
TM2: A short video of a good example of a set up that is well set up, that it's clear to hear and that the children are actually speaking well so that it gives the quality tapes for the markers. We have seen examples this week where the students are not all in the picture, or all four in the group are there, but they are so far away that you can't tell who's talking, which is important if we are doing marking on how many people in the group are participating. Also if we had pictures and the child said, “well this is a good one because…” and a lot of administrators said, “Ah, that's the such and such a picture…”, but some didn't, which makes it really hard to know what we are assessing. So, if we had just seen a video and those sorts of things were pointed out to us that 'that's really good practice', I think that we could have done a lot better at times, all of us.
TM3: I think it would be good to watch video footage and discuss “this is a good way of administrating because…or this is not such a good way”, so that we actually get a bit of an insight, I think, visually. Have a few sessions as part of our training, to give us a little bit more insight…I think that would have been helpful.
TAJ14: Perhaps see a short clip of a good video interview so that we could be more aware of camera distance, group shots and teacher role - what we should aim for.
         
Although there are differing ideas as to when the videos should be shown there was a consensus that they would be a valuable addition to the training programme. Comments to this end had also been made by Year 8 teacher administrators on their NEMP evaluation forms, completed at the end of their training week. As a consequence, NEMP had made some video clips available for the Year 4 trainee teacher administrators to watch during their break times. There were positive comments made about this:
TA4-8: Enjoyed the videos of good practice…that was excellent; it was worth its weight in gold. I learnt this week that I am definitely a visual learner; I like to see things in front of me so to see possible scenarios and how people dealt with them was excellent.
   
Using these video clips had also been identified by some NEMP staff as being worthwhile:
NEMP2: Definitely - we got comments back that they would like to see it on the first day as a whole group, and I've always thought that too. Most went and watched them, which was really good. Maybe when we go up and trial tasks in Auckland, we might film a bit of how 'stations' works and how 'independent' works, because that's not something that's on those tapes. If it could fit into the programme early in the week it would be really good. I've always thought that. It would settle their mind and it would stop me having to answer lots of those questions in that first session.
NEMP3: Yes, there was a lot of feedback that they went really well…good practice and modeling needs to be brought into a sharper focus. I think it's critical that it is built into a specific session. It should probably come up right at the first meeting and reinforced in a later session once they've built up a better understanding of the whole process.
NEMP4: Definitely…we had heaps and heaps of positive feedback about it. It was beneficial in lots of ways… even an exemplar you could find faults with… shows that the job is not that easy… shows a good model. Even though the tapes were made available for the teachers to view independently in break times or in the evening, not many had seen them until I included them at the end of the week. They commented that it would have been good to have seen them earlier in the week, which of course they could have done. We got through the 1-1 stuff with enough time for 3 of the 4 groups to have that viewing. It was at the end of the week. But in some ways it wasn't a bad time to do it as they were at a point which they had enough of a schema to actually slot in what they were seeing… I played them and we stopped them and talked about them… I think we could have more and I can't see why it can't be in that first session, just, “This is what it looks like, this is a 1-1, here's a team, this is what we're talking about and you will see more of these in a more structured way later”.
         

Risko, Yount and McAllister (1992) have suggested that viewing video tapes enables learners to acquire mental models of authentic situations which helps prepare them for entering similar situations themselves. However, in order for video to be an effective part of a training programme it is important that it is selected with particular learning outcomes in mind that help progress towards the programme's goals (Brophy, 2004: x). It has been suggested by R.J. Spiro that video tapes are best viewed in relatively short clips, often as short as one to three minutes (Spiro and Jehng, 1990: 163-205). However, the clips are repeatedly viewed and discussed, attending each time to a different feature or perspective of the situation being viewed, for example, physical layout, questioning by the teacher, encouraging student response. The permanence of video allows the trainer to select a particular focus of attention knowing that the opportunity to return to other issues is there. Brophy also emphasises the importance of scaffolded group discussion after viewing a section of video tape in order to allow trainees the opportunity to reflect on pertinent issues from the clip (Brophy, 2004: 296 & 303). This allows exposure to a variety of comments, questions and opinions, creating a richer experience for trainees than they would have had from viewing the clip alone. Viewing in isolation, without the assistance of a facilitator, means that viewers are limited in what they take from watching a clip by their prior personal knowledge and experiences. Viewers can also react judgmentally to what is seen, judging a performance as either good or bad. Facilitated viewing can shift the focus from generic judgmental responses towards more analytical discussions of what is viewed.

The administration process affected teachers' perceptions of their role in a number of ways: it reinforced their initial perceptions of the need to be organised and to have developed a good rapport with students (Section 1.8). It focused administrators on the importance of the role of ICT equipment in implementing the tasks, on the need to focus on students' efforts and not their performance and on the importance of the methods of administrating the tasks (Section 1.7). Administrating also caused teachers to discover areas that they had not perceived to be significant in their administrator role, such as the need for flexibility and the importance of a good collaborative partnership (Section 1.8). It caused a conflict in their perceptions through the need to be able to question and prompt students when instructions were not fully understood, without compromising the assessment process (Section 1.10) Participating in the administration process enabled teachers to identify ways in which the training could have better prepared them for the role, such as using video scenarios and role play (Section 1.12).

         
a1.13 Understanding of Assessment

Teachers' perceived that working with NEMP would be an opportunity for professional development in the area of assessment, enable them to develop their knowledge and understanding of assessment practices (Section 1.0). It was noted that the majority of teachers chose to apply for the position of administrator because they were interested in one or more of the curriculum areas being assessed (Figure 1). Responses to the three questionnaires monitored teachers' perceptions of their understanding of assessment before and after training and on completion of administrating. It was apparent that teachers felt they developed confidence in their knowledge and understanding of assessment. This corroborated the findings of Gilmore's research on the benefits of NEMP as professional development for teachers (1999). She found that the majority of teachers in her study had gained general ideas about assessment, gained confidence in methods of assessment and had developed their repertoire of approaches to assessment (pp. 30-33).

Figure 13 below shows teachers' confidence about their knowledge and understanding of assessment before and after training and at the end of administrating.

a1.14 Teacher markers' ideas on important skills for teacher administrators
Marking NEMP assessment data also affected teachers' perceptions of the administrator role. A small group of teachers who had completed the administrator training and had worked as administrators were identified as being involved with the marking of these tasks. After completing the marking in January 2006, their views were sought as to the most important skills necessary for a NEMP administrator. The skills identified during interviews were:
Developing a good rapport with students
Being organised
Sticking to the script
Facilitating and not teaching
         
Comments from interviews include:
TM1: You have to establish a relationship with the children so that they feel comfortable and are happy to be there Organisation is important…everything needs to be out before you start Understand the reason why you are doing the testing - so that you have an idea of the importance of asking the question properly so that you get a satisfactory answer…the importance of sticking to the script
TM2: Rapport is so important… making them feel at ease so that you get the best out of them Keeping to the script - so that it is consistent with everybody Facilitating not teaching - encouraging them to give the best answers they can
TM3: Developing a rapport with children; the way that you are sitting and your body language. Getting a 'feel' for the child so that you know when to move them along, give appropriate prompts, that kind of thing.
         
The teacher markers had retained their initial perceptions of being organised and building a rapport with students, as well as incorporating skills and understandings from the training process. From the perspective of the marker, the idea of following instructions and sticking to the script in order to follow the NEMP process was identified as being more important than it had been at the end of the administration period (Figure 8). Working in a facilitating role was considered to be important by the teacher markers. Although teacher administrators had considered this to be important at the end of their training week (Figure 6), it was less important to them at the end of their administration period (Figure 8). The teacher markers viewed a considerable amount of videoed assessment data. They observed a variety of teachers working in their new role as administrators, interacting with students and implementing the NEMP assessment process. Through marking the data they gained a better understanding of the purpose of the administrator role. It seemed that viewing these situations from the perspective of a marker analyzing data enabled teachers to develop a more thorough understanding of what is required from the administrator. It enabled them to identify what skills are necessary to implement this role effectively in order to obtain comprehensive data. Therefore it may be that in order for teachers to develop a more thorough understanding of the purpose of the administrator role they have to participate in both practical learning experiences and view video scenarios of the role. This would enable them to understand the complexity and challenges of the role and identify the skills and strategies that need to be integrated in order to perform the role successfully.

prev page / next page

top of page    |    return to Probe Studies - INDEX   |    return to Other Studies menu
For further information and contact details for the Author    |    Contact USEE