NEMP About Us Reports Access Tasks Forum Comment Probe Studies Search
nznemp
FOCUS / FORUM INDEX
.
In 2008, the Forum Comment,
was relaunched as the Focus
reflecting the closer comment from
NEMP and the panel of educators.
.


Main Index for Focus / Forum


Introduction to Focus / Forum


He Whakaputanga Whakaaro –
Introduction for Mäori Medium forums

.
Forums by year of assessment
.
.
Science
Art
Graphs, Tables & Maps
.
.
Music
Aspects of Technology
Reading & Speaking
.
.
Information Skills
Social Studies
Mathematics
.
. Listening & Viewing
Health & Phys. Ed.
Writing
.
Forums for Mäori Medium
.
.
Science
Art
Graphs, Tables & Maps
.
.
Music
Aspects of Technology
Reading & Speaking
.
.
Information Skills
Social Studies
Mathematics
.
. Listening & Viewing
Health & Phys. Ed.
Writing
.
National Education Monitoring
ISSN 1174 - 247X
.
NEMP Logo

Contact details:
Email : earu@otago.ac.nz  
Freephone 0800 808 561
Fax 64 3 479 8561

.
Credits   |   Site Map   |   Job Opportunities
Last updated October 2008
. .
.
.
CLICK on reports above to go directly to comments



 


The three reports on the 1997 assessment results were considered by a national forum of curriculum and assessment specialists, principals, teachers, advisers and representatives of national educational organisations. Their comments highlight what students are generally doing well, and those areas where improvements are desirable.

FORUM PARTICIPANTS
National Advisory Committee
Sandie Aiken
Jacky Burgon
Peter Corrigan
Warwick Elley
Val Fergusson
Alison Gilmore
Terry Hewetson
James Irving
Ian Livingstone
Grant McMillan
Denise Ongley
Jim Strachan
Neil Reid
Lynne Whitney
Marilyn Yeoman


Social Studies AdvisoryPanel
Sandra Cubitt
Alison Dow
Raewyn Gregory
Teremoana Hodges
Heather Shepherd

Information Skills Advisory Panel
Edith Curwood
Andrea Barr
Gwen Gawith
Pippa Young


Mathematics Advisory Panel
Fred Biddulph
Barry Brooker
Dan Murphy
Mäori Reference Group
Raiha Boyes
Liz Patara
Gloria Takuira

Teacher Administrators
Kathy Ferguson
Janice Gulbransen
Sue Nevezie
Jacqui Patuawa
Wiremu Rankin
Mike Young

Also
Hohepa Campbell
Chris Davidson
Raewyn Growther
.Click the Access Task for more information about those tasks
which are available to schools.


INFORMATION SKILLS 1997
.
.CLICK for full report
GOOD NEWS 
The overall attitude of students towards Information skills was positive as evidenced by the NEMP survey. They enjoyed the tasks and most were interested in gathering information.

Students knew and were confident about where to locate information from catalogues and reference books.

The majority of year 8 students had considerable success on alphabetical ordering tasks.

..Student progress from year 4 to year 8 was substantial — particularly in locating information.

Students can locate relevant information when text is well organised and explicit.

Where students had background knowledge on a topic, they found it easier to ask relevant questions. This was particularly evident on computer-based information finding tasks.

.

CONCERNS
As indicated in the summary on page 11 of the report, “The most important message emerging from the framework is that students possessing well developed information skills can perform three main tasks effectively: clarifying information needs and formulating good questions, finding and gathering information that is relevant to the questions, and then analysing and use that information to answer the questions. A substantial proportion of the intellectual demands occur during the first and third of these tasks: finding information is clearly important, but its value is greatly dependent on the extent to which it can be validly interpreted and used to answer important questions.”

Student performance indicates that there needs to be more emphasis for teacher development on these key areas:

a. defining information need and asking contextualised questions;

b. using the information analytically to answer questions.

Performance on tasks requiring analysis and classification of information suggests that students still need to bring thinking skills to bear on such tasks.

Where students lacked background knowledge their ability to ask appropriate and thoughtful questions was compromised.

There is a danger that teachers confuse students’ demonstrated confidence with computers with their ability to retrieve and analyse information.

Student perception of computers as the one stop shop for information is not backed up by students’ ability to retrieve and use information.

GENERAL
The study confirms the rationale (page 10 of report) that while information skills are integral to all curriculum areas, unless they are a conscious focus for teaching and monitoring, they tend to slip between the cracks.

Information skills are described differently in each of the curriculum statements. This NEMP report, and particularly the framework on page 11, provides necessary coherence and an overview which gives direction for teacher development and school planning.

If we are to develop students with adequate information literacy skills, a summary chart of the essential skills, exemplified by the NEMP framework, should be integral to the implementation of each individual curriculum statement.

.

Girls did better than boys on one third of the tasks. The high relationship between socio-economic levels and achievement was confirmed in this report.

.




SOCIAL STUDIES 1997
.
.CLICK for full report
GOOD NEWS 
Boys and girls had similar attitudes to teaching and learning in social studies.

Students had positive attitudes to social studies even though it ranked low in subject preferences.

Clear progress in skills, knowledge and processes from year 4 to year 8 was shown in:

• understandings of rules needed to work together
• reading, understanding and interpreting information on a topographical map
• locating New Zealand on a Pacific centred world map
• description of features special to Mäori culture
• understanding of marae kawa/protoco
• ability to use pictures to identify similarities and differences between cultural groups

.
• using social and co-operative skills to reach consensus on managing a problem (yr 8)
• drawing a sketch map of New Zealand
• locating their home town.
.
CONCERNS
Students did not perform well on some tasks that required higher order thinking skills. Students could identify issues and problems but found it difficult to offer possible solutions, particularly when working individually rather than together in teams.

Students could gather information quite well but had difficulty processing and linking it to their own experiences.

Students at year 4 and year 8 had difficulty identifying and considering a range of viewpoints on an issue.

There is a lack of general knowledge about New Zealand and the world at year 4 and year 8. However the acquisition of such knowledge is a cross curricula responsibility.

There are important differences in performance related to schools’ socio-economic environments. Students from lower socio-economic areas scored less well although they reported greater enthusiasm for learning social studies.

The low student preference rating for social studies may be linked to a general uncertainty over what the subject is about.

.GENERAL
The NEMP tasks were intended investigate achievement in aspects of knowledge, skills and understandings that communities could reasonably expect students to demonstrate by year 4 and year 8.

The tasks to be used again in four years time are not fully described in the report. These tasks will provide a valuable basis for evaluating student performance in relation to the new social studies curriculum which is to be officially implemented in the year 2000.

.



MATHEMATICS 1997
.
.CLICK for full report
GOOD NEWS 
Overall, 30 – 40% improvement was achieved from year 4 to year 8 on tasks undertaken by both levels.

New features of the curriculum such as collaborative problem solving, the use of calculators and continued success in gender equity are evident in this report.

The use of calculators at both year 4 and year 8 enhanced students’ performance.

Both year 4 and year 8 students were successful when they used collaborative problem solving strategies, although when surveyed they said they preferred to work individually.

The overall performance of boys and girls was comparable.

A number of students showed skill in using their own strategies to successfully solve problems.

Some year 4 students are already able to cope with decimal items when using calculators.

Students generally performed well when the task was set in a meaningful, real-world context.

Year 4 students performed better in a number of areas when hands on equipment was used.

In algebra that didn’t require too much calculation or understanding of underlying processes, a high percentage of year 4 students could identify patterns and relations.

.
CONCERNS 
The results show a need for further development of students’ understanding of number.

Multiplication basic facts were not consistently known by year 8 students. Greatest difficulty is with 7x and 9x .

Fractions, decimals, percentages and division all posed difficulty to a high proportion of year 8 students.

A substantial number of students were confused with mathematical signs such as  <  >  =  .  ÷


Although students had quite good success at solving problems that were meaningful and involved one step, difficulties were experienced when two or more steps were required.

The function of zero posed some difficulty in the operations of addition and multiplication.

The majority of students identified correctly the attributes of two dimensional geometrical activities but had difficulty with tasks involving three dimensional activities.

Students appear to need more exposure and practice to develop improved facility in estimation across all areas of mathematics.

.GENERAL
The wide range of NEMP tasks reflects the various aspects of the new mathematics curriculum introduced in 1993.

Mathematics was rated by students’ as third most popular subject following art and physical education.

Size of school, type of school or size of community did not have a significant influence on students’ results.

Students’ performances were strongly related to socio-economic factors.

.

..
.

The reports show that non-Mäori students performed better than Mäori students on many tasks in the curriculum areas of mathematics, social studies, and information skills.

The NEMP student survey showed that attitudes of Mäori students to mathematics and social studies were generally more positive than those of non-Mäori students.

Mäori students’ attitudes in mathematics, social studies and information skills were especially positive at year 4. Mäori students expressed confidence in their ability in mathematics and social studies. In the area of information skills they are willing to gather information voluntarily.

Mäori students performed well on tasks where they could relate strongly to the contexts.

.

MATHEMATICS
Mäori students at year 8 were substantially more successful than year 4 students on a number of tasks involving money, measurement (length, area, volume, weight, time, temperature) and geometry.

SOCIAL STUDIES
Mäori students did significantly better than non-Mäori on the marae task and did well at identifying features unique to the Mäori culture. When working together in teams to formulate rules, both year 4 and year 8 students performed well. A good percentage of year 4 teams were able to offer appropriate strategies for dealing with problems.

INFORMATION SKILLS
Mäori students at year 4 and year 8 achieved substantial success with finding and gathering information. Like non-Mäori students, they were less confident with clarifying, interpreting and using information.

.

.
Comparisons between Mäori and non-Mäori achievement reveal concerns. The substantial differences in performance evident at year 4 had not decreased by year 8, and had increased in social studies.

All stakeholders (government, teachers, parents and communities) must share responsibility for the necessary planning, resourcing and strategy needed to raise the achievement of Mäori students.



.
 
Contact Details:   Email : earu@otago.ac.nz   |   Freephone 0800 808 561   |   Fax 64 3 479 8561   |   October 2008