Anaylsis of Children's Written and Oral Language.

DISCUSSION cont.
3.2 WRITTEN LANGUAGE PERFORMANCE

Written language calls for giving overall attention to both form and content in ways that cannot be learned about solely through becoming skilled at oral language. It draws upon and uses structures and grammatical constructions that seem to be rare in everyday speech or informal conversation. The following examples highlight some of the strategies that students apparently brought to this writing task.

Student achievements on this writing task ranged from grammatically correct but unengaging pieces through to writing that was full of impact yet somehow lacking polish. Just occasionally, student writing at both Year 4 and Year 8 combined both of these aspects. Some writing showed the hallmarks of distinctively “literate” forms - through balanced clause structure, a sense of personal voice and overall craft of writing. Less well-crafted writing lacked this tightness and appeared, by contrast, to be more closely aligned with the more iterative structures of oral forms of expression. These ideas will be discussed in more detail in the sections that follow. Overall the writing samples examined revealed students at both year levels grappling with a range of “writerly” challenges as they sought to give expression to their ideas.

[NOTE: Where necessary these examples have had the spelling corrected so that attention is placed on the structure of the writing rather than on deciphering the writer's intentions. Spelling was not a focus for this probe study so the intention for all spelling efforts was accepted. Punctuation errors have been left as they were written. No other changes have been made to the students' writing.]

   
(a) Impact/Personal Voice
Students at both year levels produced recounts that were well-paced, engaging and high on impact and timing. The following opening paragraphs are from a Year 4 and a Year 8 student respectively:
  One day I walked home from school. When I got in I was happy but then mum said she had some bad news. Well Jess (my cat I'm talking about) had been at the vet. I knew that, but then mum said well Jess has died. I kept asking why. After a while I sat on mum's knee and cried. (Year 4) I was sound asleep as mum came rushing into my bedroom. I woke in shock. Mum told me to come out to the shed with her. I couldn't really be bothered but finally I followed her out there. What I saw amazed me. (Year 8)
Many writers in the sample were successful in establishing an air of sincerity (personal voice) in their writing. Their writing communicated a strong sense of their relationship to their subject matter. Some writers established a sense of voice in their writing almost immediately:
  My parents hardly ever take my sisters and I[sic] to places like Rainbow's End, the lodge, camping and stuff like that. But one day, one special day, they did. They took us to Hot Water beach! It was so cool. (Year 8)
Year 4 students achieved a distinctly personal voice in their writing no less frequently than the older students. This finding confirms the NEMP Report on Writing (July 2003) that “a fresh personal voice is found in numerous examples of children's writing.
  When I was five years old I was learning how to ride a bike without training wheels. At our house we have lights going down our driveway on a wall and I was riding around and my sister put me off and I went straight into the wall and cut my knee open for the first time. I was screaming and dad had to take me to the hospital. When I got there I first had to get it cleaned. The worst part of it was when I had to have an x-ray. It was scary because there could have been glass in there. Then I had to [go] and get seven injections before I got my stitches in. When they put the stitches in it didn't hurt at all. I had ten stitches. I had about five bandages around. I had to keep my leg straight. Every day I had to get my knee checked. (Year 4).
   
(b) Writing Structure
A great variety in the level of writing maturity was revealed in the overall writing structures students chose to use. While some students at both year levels structured their writing in a strictly chronological fashion and sought to link their ideas through use of connectives such as “and”, “then”, “after that” and “next”, others sought to deviate from a strictly chronological ordering, to include reflections, comparisons, contrasts, etc. Managing a strictly linear structure proved challenging for some students, who came to rely overly much on sentence openers such as “then”, “after that” and “next”. Overuse of “then” hampers both the flow and the impact of the following grammatically correct Year 4 sample. Personal voice is also largely absent in this piece:
  On Tuesday we went on a trip to the gallery. Then we went to the library. Then we had to colour in a picture. Then we went back and had our lunch. Then we play[ed] cricket. Then Andrew hit the ball on the roof. (Year 4)
   
The writer of the following example achieves more of a sense of story and personal engagement than the previous writer. A variety of sentence lengths are used. The pronoun “we”, however, is overused:
  We went to Nelson. We saw Mrs Gibson and Haydn, Kadin, Brogin. We had to drive four hours. We got lost first. Then we got there at last. We had McDonalds and fish and chips for tea. Then we went for a swim and a spa. It was fun. (Year 4)
   
Some writers were able to move beyond a chronological sequencing of events in order to provide interesting detail and development in their writing. These writers moved quickly to establish the setting (time and place), and then moved on to develop other aspects in more detail:
  In June my favourite uncle called Matthew was put in hospital up in Auckland because he had a brain tumour. He was in a coma for about a week. On Thursday night at 11.59 pm they got ready to do a test. When they hook him up to a machine that sends signals up to the brain then if the person that is in a coma sends messages back they keep him on life support. The clock struck 12.00. They did the test. As the family anxiously waited in the next room my uncle Matthew gave off no response. They turned off the machines and the life support. My aunty stayed by his side as he took one last breath. (Year 8)
   
The following example is a particularly impressive effort to locate the recount in temporal terms, while also establishing the relationships of the people involved:
  It was my birthday and Mrs Smith's daughter's birthday tomorrow, so at school we had a party. (Year 4)
   
Not all students established the details of time and place quite so dexterously however. In the following examples, overused conjunctions hamper the style of the prose and, in the second example this leads to a particularly unwieldy run-on sentence:
  It all started at 5.45 when I got up then got dressed then ate my breakfast. Then I had to wait about five minutes. Then it was off to the airport. (Year 4)

I went to New Plymouth and we went to New Plymouth beach. I got my shoes wet and I had to get new shoes and then went to Linda's netball and we went in this forest thing and I fell over the trees and then we went out and we had to find a motel and we fell asleep and Linda went to sleep with me and in the morning we had breakfast an[d] then we left and went home. (Year 4)
   
Some writers included in their writing conversation or direct speech while others chose to adopt a more impersonal voice. Whatever strategy they chose however, there was evidence that many writers struggled to give their writing overall shape. Their writing appeared not to be developed in a purposeful way. Once again word repetitions hamper the overall construction in the following examples:
  My special day that I will never forget is when my family took us to the Greenlane McDonalds. It wasn't that special but funny. (Year 8)
Today I am going to tell you one of my bad and happy moments. I was invited to a party and my cousins. The door was open and my cousins haven't still arrived. So in the dark it was about 7 o'clock and my friend started to chase me. I paid no attention to the road. And then I stopped in the quarter of the way of the road and suddenly a car came. (Year 8)
   
(c) Overuse of Conjunctions
As was observed in the oral language discussion, the majority of students in the viewing task used conjunctions (“because”, “and”, “so” or “even though” etc.) to link or string their ideas together in speech. These strategies work very well in speech. They are frequently unsuccessful, however, when imported directly into writing, especially if they are overused. Overuse of conjunctions can lead to very long, evolving and, (without the support of intonation and the non-verbal cues that occur in a speaking contexts) seemingly shapeless sentences. Novice writers at both Year levels overused conjunctions, perhaps in the mistaken belief that they keep the writing flowing:
 

One Sunday I went to the hot pools and I [went] swimming. I went down the slide and then I had some lunch and we got some hot chips and they were yummy and then I went back into the water and when we went to the pools in the car I said mum are we there yet and the stupid radio was on and I was playing sweet and sour. (Year 4)

The day I will never forget is my big birthday party. I will never forget that day because we got to paint our faces and play lots of games and we played with my little puppy and I got to invite eight friends over but only three came over. (Year 4)

A day I'll never forget is when I went to my mate Chevy's party and they were drinking and Tamaiti was there and I asked if I could ride on his bike and he said yes. So I went down the hill and came back up and my mate Ata jumped on it and we went down the hill fast and I said boy there's no brakes but there was and she was falling all over me and I could not see and she was drunk and there was a party down the road from Chevy's. (Year 8)

When I was at school out at L. I was playing on the playground and I broke my arm while I was swinging on the mice bars and my friend ran to the office to get someone and they came to pick me up and then we went to ring my mum because she had to pick me up and take me to the hospital and I got eight x-rays but it was badly broken so I had to go to the theatre to get my arm pinned and I was in hospital for six weeks and when it was over I was put in a wheelchair and taken to my room and it was not fun for the six weeks so let's go back to when I was in my bed. (Year 8)

   
The following two examples have a more developed sense of story than the previous examples, but again overuse of the conjunction “and” weakens the overall impact of what is nevertheless rather engaging work:
 

One might me, mum, and dad went out for tea but Snowy my dog had to stay at home. But dad forgot to close the windows and it was really cold that night. My dog Snowy got out of the window and went down the road to my friend's home and my friend came back to my home and he got my dog and he tied him up and he froze in the ditch that night. We came home and found him dead. (Year 8)

It was my grandmother's birthday on Sunday and she is 89 years old and she wants to beat my auntie's record of 91 and I think she is going to do just that. (Year 8)

   
Students used the conjunctions “and” and “so” not only to signal chronological sequence (in the sense of “next”, or “then”). They also used these words to mean “however”, “but” or “yet”. These conjunctions were also sometimes used in a temporal sense, to indicate that two things that happened simultaneously.
   
(d) Sentence Construction and Linking
There was a noticeable decline in the use of compound sentences in the writing of the Year 8 students, and a concurrent increase in their use of complex sentences. However writers at both Year 4 and Year 8 could demonstrate careful ordering of ideas and subordination of clauses to carry meaning in their sentences. These writers knew how to craft sentences that had an arching shape and climax to them. They were able to develop their recounts into a well-paced piece of writing:
 

Last year I went to my uncle's medieval club. I had to wear chain mail and I had to carry a real heavy sword and shield. When I got hit by a sword it felt as if it had gone straight through my chain mail. I felt as if I was going to die. When I got struck pain shot through me like lightning. Luckily I didn't get cut. (Year 4)

We were all ready in our Irish dancing dresses. Kate was trying to get our attention. She said she was hyperventilating but everyone knew she wasn't. (Year 8)

At the beginning of the year, March, we made a cycle trip to Waiheke Island. We went in the bus to the port and waited for the ferry to arrive. We waited in the cold weather, the wind blowing furiously. (Year 8)

And then the worst bit happened. We waited. We waited for what seemed like a lifetime. (Year 8)

   
The skill of careful linking sentences was evident even in younger writers. These writers were able to produce writing with a strong sense of fluidity, and to craft sentences that flowed one to the next in an apparently seamless fashion. Two Year 4 submissions are included here in their entirety to demonstrate the achievement of these young writers. The second example demonstrates perhaps even better than the first, the writer's careful and delicate sense of timing. The subject of this recount is not disclosed until the third sentence, and then only obliquely. Sentence structures are varied and both students manage the chronological sequence of events without being restricted by them. Both of these writers are already mastering some of the most complex aspects of the writing process - communicating with the absent reader.
 

5 weeks ago my mum's second best friend came to stay. Something terrible had happened. My mum's friend came and told us what had happened. She saw her husband stressed out so she ran out as fast as she could and then she wasn't allowed to contact her husband. So we had eight kids staying at out house for a whole week. There were a lot of dishes to be done which was quite dumb. But we had help. Then when they had things sorted out they went back up to their house. (Year 4)

We went to benchmark to get 20 planks of wood and boy they were big. We went to Resene to get some nails and some paint. I chose red and blue for my tree-house. We got to work. I started on the chimney while my dad started on the windows. Then we both did the roof and body. Then it was done. All we had to do was the painting. (Year 4)

   
By contrast with these two examples, however, the following one does not achieve a sense of flow at all. The writing is quite punctuated. The student overuses the personal pronoun “I” and writes at the level of the sentence rather than in terms of a larger whole:
  I like doing jumps and wheelys. My best flip is a backwards flip. I only can do it only on big ranps…I remember when [I] could do a wheely when I was five. It was freaky but I still done a wheely. I wasn't scared. (Year 4)
   
Overall these ideas are connected is a manner more reminiscent of a conversational than a “writing” style. This student does not sequence his ideas well and is consequently not successful in framing the recount around the assigned topic. As well as overuse of the personal pronoun, other repeated words (only, when, wheely) halt the flow of the writing. This student is perhaps not aware of the effect that these repetitions have, or that simply by eliminating the second repetition of “wheely” the flow of ideas could be greatly improved. The altered sentence would have a much stronger personal voice:
  “I remember when I could do a wheely when I was five. It was freaky but I still [did] it. I wasn't scared.”
   
(e) Redundancy in Writing
While redundancy is an accepted feature of oral language, it is considered an error when it occurs in written language. Doubling up of various sorts are problems in each of the following examples:
 

I will never forget being in Movie World. We went to the Goldcoast with my mum and two sisters and me. We decided we would go. I said movie world. So we went to movie world. (Year 4)
The meeting was about our behaviour we should use while in public. (Year 8)

   
(f) Register
There are many syntactical forms that are characteristic of written rather than spoken language. For example, the three-clause balance of the following closing sentence is surely more reminiscent of written prose than of informal speech:
  When we got back I had a good look round, read some books, watched T.V. and went to bed. (Year 4)
The following story opening is also distinctively “literate” in construction:
  It was the second day of our holiday in beautiful Fiji. We were up and ready to go. (Year 8)
Other grammatical structures in students' writing seemed more clearly oral in character. For example, the following writing could be a transcription of direct speech. It uses a very colloquial register and the use of “like” is a typical filler word in oral language delivery:
  The other schools had like 39 in their Kapahaka groups and we still blew them away. (Year 8)
   
(g) Syntax
Use of incorrect syntax in speech or in writing does not necessarily indicate an error since it can indicate that the student is learning about the application of particular grammatical construction. However, Maori and Pacific Island students at both year levels showed syntax errors in their speech and their writing at a frequency that was statistically significant. The following two examples from Maori and Pacific Island students' writing samples, employ forms of grammar that are unlikely to be encountered in either speech or writing:
 

“This person is putting up his hand to tell his story and to get more and more learned at reading.” (Year 8)

“Because in this one someone's reading it to them [points]…and in this one [points] they're listening to it on some headphones so they don't have to read it theirselves.” (Year 8)

   
(h) Syntax Errors
In general, student writing samples included a range of syntactical irregularities. Data analysis revealed that this is an area where older students continue to find challenges in their writing, and that instances of syntactical irregularities were found in similar proportions at both Year levels:
  We maded a bed for her. (Year 4)
They brang heaps of presents and flowers. (Year 4)
My family all stucked together and we all went on the same rides together. (Year 8)
Because of the first time I had gone down there and saw snow. (Year 8)
These syntactical errors are relatively easy for adults to spot in students' writing (and are therefore relatively easy for teachers to mark as incorrect). Interestingly however, they are not necessarily errors that students would detect for themselves during the editing process. Nor are they necessarily useful indicators of writing weakness, though they require correction. Instances such as these in students' work may herald an emerging understanding of how a particular grammatical irregularity works.
   

(i) Punctuation and Handwriting
Punctuation is a writing convention that receives a lot of attention in classroom teaching. Certainly students need to learn how to use these symbols correctly, and to understand that one of the main reason for using full stops and capital letters correctly is to improve clarity and avoid ambiguity. As was discussed in Section 2, this study revealed no marked increase in mastery of punctuation by Year 8 level.

Although punctuation and handwriting are features of writing that have no counterparts in speech, some students nevertheless tried to exploit these features to carry meaning or emphasis or emotion in their writing. One piece of writing had a total of 23 exclamation marks in it. Some students introduced into their writing such devices as block capitalisation, underlining, and other hieroglyphics to personalise their work and perhaps also to overcome some of the 'distance' limitations of print.

   
3.3 STUDENT'S ATTITUDES TO WRITING

In the NEMP attitudinal survey, students were asked to indicate their personal opinions about writing, their skills and their strengths as writers. Statistical findings reported in section 2 suggested there was no clear connection between students' sense of their own writing ability and the quality of the writing they produced in this task. Students were also cautious when gauging what their teacher thought of their writing and when asked what they thought they needed to do to get better at writing, few students at either Year 4 or Year 8 could articulate specific, achievable skills to work. Typical responses were at best vague:

  More time, more ideas (Year 4)
Don't know. Try hard (Year 8)
Think more and concentrate (Year 8)
   
Anecdotal comments gathered from the writing surveys suggests that students are not used to thinking of working at their writing in terms of specific aspects of either form or content. The articulation of specific, achievable strategies to improve writing was rare, even at year 8 level:
  Starting sentences using better words (Year 8)
I need to put the character where s/he's actually feeling the events instead of putting it into someone else's side of the story (Year 8)
   
While there was a widely stated belief among students across both year groups that writing is improved by using your imagination, it was not clear how students thought they might capitalise on this. While many children said that they believe reading improves writing, few students were able to go on to say why that might be so.
  Read more so I enjoy writing and write more often (Year 8)
   
3.4 SUMMARY

Close analysis of these writing samples and writing surveys raises some fascinating issues surrounding the teaching of writing. There are a variety of language features in students' writing that merit attention. Certainly the study revealed some surface errors that would benefit from proofreading - e.g., checking for instances of omitted words, correcting punctuation marks such as capital letters, commas and full stops. Many of the issues and notable features of these writing submissions go beyond the surface features of writing. Weaknesses in grammatical construction, overuse of conjunctions, and other issues relating to both form and content are errors that students might not detect for themselves in the writing or the editing process. Some “errors” (for example, those relating to a student's experimentation with grammatical structures) might in fact herald growth and experimentation with more complex forms.

Analysis also underlines the fact that if student writing is to be assessed solely or largely in terms of punctuation, paragraphing and other surface grammar features, potential depth, impact or personal voice in the writing might be overlooked. It might also negatively influence a student's sense of what constitutes really good writing. Teachers might unwittingly reinforce this attitude through their marking strategies. A writing submission that is technically correct and grammatically sound is not necessarily one that is especially memorable, and beneath the untidiness and misplaced pronunciation of a students' writing there can sometimes be found a significant writing voice. Close analysis of these samples points to the importance of detailed structural teaching to enable students to understand how and why some literary constructions work better than others. Close examination of these writing samples suggests that at least some of the difficulties students encounter when composing effective written language may stem from misunderstandings about the fundamental differences between the spoken and written forms. Students use in their writing the grammatical forms and language structures with which they are familiar.


prev page / next page

top of page    |    return to Probe Studies - INDEX   |    return to Other Studies menu
For further information and contact details for the Author    |    Contact USEE