CRITICAL, CREATIVE, REFLECTIVE AND LOGICAL THINKING IN THE NEMP ASSESSMENTS
7.3 MARKING CRITERIA FOR LOGICAL THINKING TASKS
In this section the marking criteria used in the NEMP assessments are considered for a number of the tasks which were judged to involve logical thinking. The intention is to examine the extent to which the criteria capture the logical thinking aspect of the tasks. In the table below the tasks selected are given together with those parts of the marking criteria which relate to the logical thinking aspects of the tasks. The coding categories for the responses are also given.
 
7.3.1 Science
 
1995  
 
Task:  
 
Page 16 Classification
Y8
1 - 1
 
    Sort cards into groups.
Marking Criteria:
    Sorted cards into piles
Yes / No
 
    Provided reasons to differentiate between groups
Yes / No
 
    Gave defensible reasons
Yes / No
 
Comment:
    The criteria do not seem to capture the logical nature of the task very well.
     
1999  
Task:  
Page 32 Ball bounce
Y8
Team
 
    Plan an experiment
Marking Criteria:
  R12 Predictions and discussion for 6th ball
  Rating for discussion of the probable ranking of the 6th ball, the arguments presented and discussion of results if different from prediction.

Very Good:

good ideas and interpretive skills

Moderate:

some good ideas and interpretive skills

Poor:

lacking good ideas and interpretive skills
Comment:
  The criteria do seem to capture the logical nature of the task.
 
7.3.2 Graphs, Tables and Maps
     
1995  
Task:  
Page 26 Tuatua School electricity
Y4/8
Station
 
    Why do you think that the consumption in that month was lowest?
Marking Criteria:
  3b No reasonable answer
Some relevant BUT some irrelevant information
Referred to graph
Appropriate response
Comment:
    The criteria do not seem to capture the logical nature of the task very well.
     
7.3.3 Technology
     
1996  
Task:  
Page 17 Crane
Y4/8
1 - 1
 
    Tell me how it works.
Marking Criteria:
 
3
Why large cog makes the string move more quickly.
   

Clearly explains effect of more teeth on cog

   
Vague explanation - with some merit
   

No idea

Comment:
    The criteria do seem to capture the logical nature of the task
     
2000  
Task:  
Page 16 Buzzer
Y4/8
1 - 1
 
    Design an electric circuit and explain.
Marking Criteria:
    None of the criteria relate to the explanations which were required in the task.
Comment:
    There is presumably some logical thinking behind the design, but the criteria do not seem to capture this well.
     
7.3.4 Reading and Speaking
     
1996  
Task:  
Page 50 Nils and Nelli
Y4/8
Team
 
    Put cards in a suitable order
Marking Criteria:
    1 Story links pictures sensibly
   
Weak
Moderate
Strong
 
Comment:
    The criteria do seem to capture the logical nature of the task.
     
7.3.5 Information Skills
     
1997  
Task:  
Page 35 Chocolate factory
Y4/8
Station
 
    Choose cards to show the main steps in production and put them in order.
Marking Criteria:
 
3
Has the student chosen the cards which are not part of the main steps
Yes / No
 
 
5
Order of remaining cards Look at each letter the student has identified and count the number of places it is from the correct placement of that letter on the template. Total the score.
Comment:
    There is presumably some logical thinking behind the selection, but the criteria do not seem to capture this well.
     
2001  
Task:  
Page 37 Stop-Look-Think
Y4/8
1 - 1
 
    Explain what might happen next.
Marking Criteria:
    The section asking for an explanation of what might happen next was not marked.
    Comment:
    The criteria do not seem to capture the logical nature of the task.
     
7.3.6 Mathematics
     
1997  
Task:  
Page 18 Numbers in squares
Y4/8
Team
 
    Put numbers in squares to solve a problem.
Marking Criteria:
  1ci Evidence of a sophisticated strategy
Yes / No
 
  1cii Evidence of a systematic trial and error
Yes / No
 
1ciii Random trial and error
Yes / No
 
3i Did they suggest a strategy which takes into account the pattern?
Yes / No
 
3ii Did they suggest systematically changing one of the numbers?
Yes / No
 
3iii Did they suggest randomly changing numbers?
Yes / No
 
       
4 From their work and the strategies they suggest was there:
  evidence of a systematic plan which took account of the numbers? evidence of a plan which did not take account of the numbers? no evidence of following a plan?
       
Comment:
    The criteria seem to capture the logical nature of the task particularly well.
     
2001  
Task:  
Page 55 Statistics items B
Y4/8
Independent
Maori
  Explain to Maria why she is right or wrong.
Marking Criteria:
R24
Maria is right or wrong
 

Clear explanation that Maria is wrong with diagram
Clear explanation that Maria is wrong without a diagram
On right line but vague
Any other response

Comment:
  The criteria do seem to capture the logical nature of the task.
   
2001  
Task:  
Page 57 Photo line-up
Y8
Team
 
    Arrange cards logically.
Marking Criteria:
 
R9
Strategy group employed
   

Very good
Good
Moderate
Poor

Comment:
    The criteria do seem to capture the logical nature of the task.
     
7.3.7 Listening and Viewing
     
1998  
Task:  
Page 30* Robbers in the night
Y4/8
1 - 1
 
    Put pictures in logical order.
Marking Criteria:
 
R2
Story - logical order / sense
   

All pictures in logical order
Some pictures in logical order
No pictures in logical order

Comment:
    The criteria do seem to capture the logical nature of the task.
     
7.3.8 Writing
     
2002  
Task:  
Page 23 Te Potiki
Y4/8
Station
Maori
    Put cards in logical order.
Marking Criteria:
 
R1
Has student created a plot / logical flow using the 4 pictures?
   

Every picture logically linked in sequence

   

One picture not logically linked

   

Two pictures not logically linked

   

Little or no linking

Comment:
    The criteria do seem to capture the logical nature of the task.
     
7.4 COMMENTS
  Tasks involving logical thinking skills were found in 8 of the 12 curriculum assessment areas.
  Science, Mathematics, and Technology contributed the most tasks.
  Classifying, planning, and explaining were the focus of many of the tasks. The tasks tended not to be open-ended which reduced the potential for the marking criteria to capture the thinking behind the responses.
  13(30%) of the 43 tasks use a 1 - 1 interview approach and this indicates that a number of the tasks have greater potential to assess the nature of the thinking used by students.
  Again, it seems that a list of tasks of this nature would be a useful teacher resource.
     

prev page / next page

top of page    |    return to Probe Studies - INDEX   |    return to Other Studies menu
For further information and contact details for the Author    |    Contact USEE